Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shuang
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 100

    'n' in PacBio assembled sequences?

    I used Celera to assemble PacBio with correction with 454 sequences.

    However, I found letter n (other than atcg) in the assembled result. Why ? and how do I fix it?
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    You can get an "N" in assemblies from all read types, and typically this means there was no clear consensus - some of the reads suggested on base, other reads another. Some assemblies might use other IUPAC ambiguity codes if they can tell for example the base is either an A or C.

    Such positions could be SNPs if you are sequencing a mixed population, or different alleles if you are sequencing something with two (or more) copies of each chromosome, or errors in assembly (e.g. merging two similar regions into one), etc.

    It is also possible by bad luck in a low coverage region that all your reads at that position happen to have an N rather than a clear base.

    Comment

    • jbingham
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 24

      #3
      Good eye. N is from Celera Assember in this case, rather than PacBio.

      If you've got enough PacBio coverage, you can run Quiver for assembly polishing, which can lead to final accuracy of > 99.999%. See www.pacbiodevnet.com/quiver. That can remove or introduce Ns, depending on the situation. You can use this option to reduce the number of Ns in certain cases.

      --noEvidenceConsensusCall=reference

      Comment

      • shuang
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 100

        #4
        Do yo mean use Quiver instead of celera ?

        Is Quiver a standard/common tool for assembling PacBio? (I'm new to PacBio)

        Comment

        • jbingham
          Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 24

          #5
          Quiver is a beta tool for PacBio that will become standard in the next release. It's available on github now. Here's a documentation link:

          GitHub is where people build software. More than 150 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 420 million projects.

          Comment

          • shuang
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2011
            • 100

            #6
            Thank you for your reply. I have 2 more questions.

            1. Does Quiver still need next-generation sequences for correction?

            2. Any chance, by changing any parameters, I could reduce n in Celra?

            Comment

            • jbingham
              Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 24

              #7
              Good questions. Quiver is a consensus and variant caller, like the GATK Haplotype Caller, rather than a de novo assembly algorithm.

              1. HGAp does not need 2nd gen sequences (or PacBio CCS) for error correction, if that's your question. Quiver is used by HGAp, but it's only for generating the final assembly sequence after you've got your contigs. It's not an "error correction" algorithm.

              2. I'm not aware of which parameters would reduce the Ns in Celera Assembler. Sorry!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                Yesterday, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              10 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...