Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shuang
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 100

    #1

    'n' in PacBio assembled sequences?

    I used Celera to assemble PacBio with correction with 454 sequences.

    However, I found letter n (other than atcg) in the assembled result. Why ? and how do I fix it?
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    You can get an "N" in assemblies from all read types, and typically this means there was no clear consensus - some of the reads suggested on base, other reads another. Some assemblies might use other IUPAC ambiguity codes if they can tell for example the base is either an A or C.

    Such positions could be SNPs if you are sequencing a mixed population, or different alleles if you are sequencing something with two (or more) copies of each chromosome, or errors in assembly (e.g. merging two similar regions into one), etc.

    It is also possible by bad luck in a low coverage region that all your reads at that position happen to have an N rather than a clear base.

    Comment

    • jbingham
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 24

      #3
      Good eye. N is from Celera Assember in this case, rather than PacBio.

      If you've got enough PacBio coverage, you can run Quiver for assembly polishing, which can lead to final accuracy of > 99.999%. See www.pacbiodevnet.com/quiver. That can remove or introduce Ns, depending on the situation. You can use this option to reduce the number of Ns in certain cases.

      --noEvidenceConsensusCall=reference

      Comment

      • shuang
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 100

        #4
        Do yo mean use Quiver instead of celera ?

        Is Quiver a standard/common tool for assembling PacBio? (I'm new to PacBio)

        Comment

        • jbingham
          Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 24

          #5
          Quiver is a beta tool for PacBio that will become standard in the next release. It's available on github now. Here's a documentation link:

          GitHub is where people build software. More than 225 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 800 million projects.

          Comment

          • shuang
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2011
            • 100

            #6
            Thank you for your reply. I have 2 more questions.

            1. Does Quiver still need next-generation sequences for correction?

            2. Any chance, by changing any parameters, I could reduce n in Celra?

            Comment

            • jbingham
              Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 24

              #7
              Good questions. Quiver is a consensus and variant caller, like the GATK Haplotype Caller, rather than a de novo assembly algorithm.

              1. HGAp does not need 2nd gen sequences (or PacBio CCS) for error correction, if that's your question. Quiver is used by HGAp, but it's only for generating the final assembly sequence after you've got your contigs. It's not an "error correction" algorithm.

              2. I'm not aware of which parameters would reduce the Ns in Celera Assembler. Sorry!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              38 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              44 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...