Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • all_your_base
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 40

    #1

    Tophat can't find read-pairs??

    Hi, got a question that may be a very quick answer... I am using PE Illumina reads for Tophat runs, and always get output like this:


    bowtie.left_kept_reads.log
    52107199 reads; of these:
    52107199 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    21494360 (41.25%) aligned 0 times
    27619125 (53.00%) aligned exactly 1 time
    2993714 (5.75%) aligned >1 times
    58.75% overall alignment rate

    bowtie.right_kept_reads.log
    52025239 reads; of these:
    52025239 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    23520504 (45.21%) aligned 0 times
    25623432 (49.25%) aligned exactly 1 time
    2881303 (5.54%) aligned >1 times
    54.79% overall alignment rate



    ...and I am using Tophat with the following command:

    tophat --no-convert-bam -p 20 genome_ref sample1_1.fastq sample1_2.fastq


    My question: why is tophat saying that 100% of the left and right reads were unpaired? My two reads files have exactly the same number of lines and were filtered before tophat to only keep the matching PE reads. Here is an example of my reads:


    ==> sample1_1.fastq <==
    @HHHABC:23:CEX1CEE:4:1101:2733:2083/1 1:N:0:CGATGT
    GCACATCCAATAACAAATTGTCTTTTATAAATGGTTACTTATTTGAGCAGAATTGAGCAAGACAGCCATGCAAAGTGTTACGTTGAAATACTGTCAATATG
    +
    @@@DDDDFHGHGGGGIGIJGHIIJJJICICICHHHFHIIIGJJJIGEGGHBFFHHEHIJJJJJJIEIGHFHIHIIHHIEEHFHFEDEDACEAEEEDDCDCD
    @HHHABC:23:CEX1CEE:4:1101:2837:2057/1 1:N:0:CGATGT
    CTTGTTTAGTTCGGGACTCCGCGGCTCTGGAACGGAACTACAAGAGCCGCAGGTCCGGTTTGAAAAGCTGCAACAGCTGGGTTT
    +
    :BDFDDFBFFFAEGIADHHGG8?@FHGFDH<FBFHGAEEC?E>EAB7@>BB@B55:=B?BDDA:>>C8>@9>AA?AACDC0<??


    ==> sample1_2.fastq <==
    @HHHABC:23:CEX1CEE:4:1101:2733:2083/2 2:N:0:CGATGT
    CTTACATTTTCGCATGGCTTAATATATAGCAGGTATTAAACATTACCTATATTTATAAGTCCATCATTAATGAACAACATATGGGTTATTGTCATATTGAC
    +
    @CFFFFFHDFHHIJJJIJIIJIEIEEGHGGIGCFGHEHGHIGHHIJJGIIGGIIEIJDEIHIJIJJJJIJIIEIFGIDHHGAEFDFDBCCDEEEDEEECC
    @HHHABC:23:CEX1CEE:4:1101:2837:2057/2 2:N:0:CGATGT
    GAATGAATTAACCTCGAAATATGCTGCTGGATGCAAAGAAGTCGAATGTATTTATGATCTAGATTTATTATTGCGGTGAAGCAGCTGACATGTTTCTGTCC
    +
    @<<DDADAFAFHHIJJJJCB>FHGIIIFGJBGHAHGCGECG@FDEEHH*9BFHIGIHE=CFG><FHDGCEE>@AAEEHDCFBCEDCEACCCCDEEDDDDC>



    Does anyone else experience the same problem!? Thanks for the input.
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    I am guessing here but I suspect what is happening is that Tophat is running bowtie twice -- once with only the left reads and one only with the right reads. Thus bowtie does not think that there is any pairing since bowtie does not get pairs to begin with. After bowtie is complete with the two separate input files then Tophat gets to pick-and-choose the reads it wants from the left and right outputs in order to make a sensible alignment based on the known intron/exons.

    Comment

    • huyvuong
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 10

      #3
      I think the bit flag in the output bam file will tell you that it's pair end read

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      38 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...