Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jie
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3

    #1

    how to obtain copy number info in an exome sequencing data analysis pipeline

    Hi,

    I'm new to exome sequencing data analysis, and I'm puzzled by the fact that the tool packages I have (GATK, samtools) only output the CNV locations instead of the true copy numbers for each exome, or each gene. Is there any tool that can give me the copy numbers for an exome or a gene?

    Besides, if I have two samples, can I directly compare their copy numbers, or I should apply some sort of normalization first?

    Thank you very much for the help!

    Jie
  • JackieBadger
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 385

    #2
    Depends on how you are identifying copy number. I think the paper below says that using depth comparisons is not very reliable. If not there is a recent paper out there that says just that. In any case, you need a control.

    http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals...ts535.abstract

    Comment

    • jie
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you very much!

      I have read the paper. It listed all the challenges that may mess up the copy number computing. But my question is, whatever algorithm a program used (e.g. reading depth), there has to be a copy number calculate for each exome btw two samples in some point of the pipeline so that the program can call a CNV. But why that copy number never output to the final result, and is there a way to configure the pipeline (such as in Samtools or GATK) to pull that copy number out?

      Jie

      Comment

      • arcolombo698
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 142

        #4
        Calculating the CNV

        I am interested in the same problem. Have you any recommendations? I am using ANNOVAR, can GATK call the CNV?

        I only know that the raw VCF file does calculate the read depth, and am not sure how the read depth relates to the CNV?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...