Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • amarth
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 14

    #1

    Getting just a few alignments with Tophat2

    I made an alignment for a 1.1GB file, the RNA-seq reads were in fastq (Illumina) format. The reference was in fasta, so i decided to convert the large file to fasta...

    Later i made the bowtie libraries, and then i started. When tophat finished the work, i looked to the output folder, and i saw that the sequences aligned were a 28MB *.bam file, on the other hand, the sequences *rejected* were almost a 350MB *.bam file... I deduce that the file size is proportional to the sequences amount.

    So, i'm a rookie on Bioinformatics, and my question is: is it normal to have such file sizes on both files, or i'm just doing it wrong?
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    #2
    1) Do not convert the reads to fasta. That is unnecessary, Tophat takes fastq files....your references will always be in fasta, this is not an issue.

    2) It sounds like you did have a lot of unmapped reads, but its impossible to diagnose the issue from what you have described. Try providing some information like, the exact commands you ran Tophat with or some examples of unmapped reads.

    Comment

    • amarth
      Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 14

      #3
      1) Thanks for the advice,

      2) Could it be the seq Quality?









      The Tophat2 command i ran was:
      tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
      so much thanks

      Comment

      • EGrassi
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 66

        #4
        What does samtools flagstat on the accepted_hits.bam and rejected looks like?

        Just to mention the fact: I had some paired data with fastqc results similar to yours and quality trimming lead me to nothing, the problem was about the -r/--mate-std-dev parameters (I had paired data): it seems that in some cases tophat really needs them (-r 300 --mate-std-dev 50 gave me a 60% percentage of properly paired reads against the 5% without them...I will never trust the FAQ/manual again ).

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by amarth View Post
          2) Could it be the seq Quality?
          The quality of your reads looks fine.
          The Tophat2 command i ran was:
          Code:
          tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
          so much thanks
          There is no '--sequence-length' option for tophat. Did you mean '--segment-length'? If so 100 (presumably the full length of your read) is not an appropriate setting. The default value for --segment-length (25) is appropriate for most cases.

          To diagnose the problem start using only default options and then work out from there.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...