Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mattanswers
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 65

    #1

    Cuffdiff output seems inconsistant

    (I am transferring this question from the RNA-Seq Forum (where I have deleted it) to this Forum)

    I have two sets of time series data. Same conditions, just done on different days. With each set, I have separately gone through TopHat, Cufflinks, Cuffmerge, and Cuffdiff.

    Then I hierarchically clustered the 'significant' ('yes' in the significant column) results and found a small but appreciable subset of genes that are present at one time point (say 30min) in one set, but absent in the other set at the same time point.

    At a closer look, when the gene is significant it is found only once in the gene.exps table output of Cuffdiff, but in the same time point of the other set where it is not significant the gene appears multiple times, each time with an equivalent locus but different log2-fold change values. Also, at least one of the log2-fold change values is very close to the log2-fold change value found for the significant gene in the other set.

    My feeling is that if Cuffdiff did not divide up the gene (multiple entries) it would be significant in that set as well.

    Does anyone have an explanation for why the gene would have multiple entries in one set, but only one entry in other another otherwise equivalent experiment ?
  • mattanswers
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 65

    #2
    Some info to clarify the above question

    Let me add, that I realize the difficulties of 'significant' genes when you do not have duplicates.

    The purpose of my analysis is to get an idea of the consistency of results between the two otherwise identical experiments. In other words to check the consistency of the 'bench' experiments.

    The question addressing genes being listed multiple times in the output in one experiment, and only once in the other experiment remains.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...