Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mattanswers
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 65

    Cuffdiff output seems inconsistant

    (I am transferring this question from the RNA-Seq Forum (where I have deleted it) to this Forum)

    I have two sets of time series data. Same conditions, just done on different days. With each set, I have separately gone through TopHat, Cufflinks, Cuffmerge, and Cuffdiff.

    Then I hierarchically clustered the 'significant' ('yes' in the significant column) results and found a small but appreciable subset of genes that are present at one time point (say 30min) in one set, but absent in the other set at the same time point.

    At a closer look, when the gene is significant it is found only once in the gene.exps table output of Cuffdiff, but in the same time point of the other set where it is not significant the gene appears multiple times, each time with an equivalent locus but different log2-fold change values. Also, at least one of the log2-fold change values is very close to the log2-fold change value found for the significant gene in the other set.

    My feeling is that if Cuffdiff did not divide up the gene (multiple entries) it would be significant in that set as well.

    Does anyone have an explanation for why the gene would have multiple entries in one set, but only one entry in other another otherwise equivalent experiment ?
  • mattanswers
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 65

    #2
    Some info to clarify the above question

    Let me add, that I realize the difficulties of 'significant' genes when you do not have duplicates.

    The purpose of my analysis is to get an idea of the consistency of results between the two otherwise identical experiments. In other words to check the consistency of the 'bench' experiments.

    The question addressing genes being listed multiple times in the output in one experiment, and only once in the other experiment remains.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...