Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Petrichor
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 10

    Average insert size from paired end data

    Hi there!

    I am searching for a way to get the average insert size from my data, that was not included.
    The dataset i am using is paired-end Illumina data and I ran BLAST.

    Has someone a clue or an idea how to get the average insert size from my data?
    Is there maybe a simple solution or even a command for this?

    Best regards,
    Petrichor.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    If you use a standard aligner (bowtie, bwa, etc.) on a small chunk of the data, the resulting SAM file will contain insert sizes for all of the mapped reads. You could then just average that with awk or perl or whatever you like.

    Comment

    • swbarnes2
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 910

      #3
      BLAST? On Illumina data? Why didn't you use a short read aligner?

      Comment

      • boetsie
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 245

        #4
        You can only use a short-read aligner if you have a reference, as dpryan suggested. Use the paired-end option of the aligner. If you do not have a close reference, make a quick-and-dirty assembly of a subset of your data. Next, align your paired-end reads to the assembly and obtain the insert-size. Third option, probably the quickest, is to ask for the insert size at your sequence provider

        Regards,
        Boetsie

        Comment

        • Petrichor
          Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 10

          #5
          Thanks for the responds!

          Changed to bowtie2 and used some short awk-commands.
          Got some results, hope they will work.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...