Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bonifera
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 10

    Cross-platform Assembly (PacBio & Illumina)

    How many of you have successfully merged and assembled a genome using PacBio reads merged with Illumina reads?

    I'm wondering the best way to approach this.

    Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated.
  • sisch
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 29

    #2
    In very general:
    I remember someone suggested curing the long PacBio reads with the accurate Illumina reads by mapping. And then assembling the resulting high quality consensus reads in a traditional way (i.e. assembler of your choice). In essence, you could call that a reference based pre-assembly where the reference are the PacBio reads.

    Unfortunately I can't give any reference, because I can't remember where I heard this.

    Best,
    Simon

    Comment

    • Scaon
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Reference

      Comment

      • bonifera
        Member
        • May 2013
        • 10

        #4
        @sisch Thanks for your input though! It certainly gives us a starting point.

        @Scaon Awesome! Thank you so much!

        Comment

        • lhon
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 5

          #5
          Hgap

          See also HGAP, the nonhybrid PacBio-only assembly approach:

          Comment

          • phenotype
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2008
            • 8

            #6
            Why bother

            Hi Simon,

            You must be talking about the PacBioToCA script (http://sourceforge.netapps/mediawiki...tle=PacBioToCA) where you have to convert fastq files to .frg files and use those as input to Celera Assembler.

            But I agree with lhon. Why bother when there is a much simpler workflow using long reads only with HGAP in SMRT Analysis 2.0.0? (http://pacbiodevnet.com/)

            Comment

            • krobison
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2007
              • 734

              #7
              What scale genome are you sequencing?

              I've found the HGAP pipeline very useful, but you do need to get high coverage (100X+), which may not be economical on larger genomes. Illumina may also be valuable for correcting indels that Quiver doesn't clean up. I've had less luck with PacBioToCA, in part because some parts of the genomes of interest simply don't show up in the Illumina data.

              If HGAP isn't quite getting the genome closed due to coverage limitations, I have had luck closing some gaps by using Minimus2 to merge an Illumina assembly and a PacBio one. Directly assembling the two sets with MIRA or CA is on my to-do list.

              Comment

              • bonifera
                Member
                • May 2013
                • 10

                #8
                @phenotype

                We're trying to correct the PacBio long read and high error rate with the illumina short read and low error rate. These are the data sets that we have

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...