Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bonifera
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 10

    #1

    Cross-platform Assembly (PacBio & Illumina)

    How many of you have successfully merged and assembled a genome using PacBio reads merged with Illumina reads?

    I'm wondering the best way to approach this.

    Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated.
  • sisch
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 29

    #2
    In very general:
    I remember someone suggested curing the long PacBio reads with the accurate Illumina reads by mapping. And then assembling the resulting high quality consensus reads in a traditional way (i.e. assembler of your choice). In essence, you could call that a reference based pre-assembly where the reference are the PacBio reads.

    Unfortunately I can't give any reference, because I can't remember where I heard this.

    Best,
    Simon

    Comment

    • Scaon
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Reference

      Comment

      • bonifera
        Member
        • May 2013
        • 10

        #4
        @sisch Thanks for your input though! It certainly gives us a starting point.

        @Scaon Awesome! Thank you so much!

        Comment

        • lhon
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 5

          #5
          Hgap

          See also HGAP, the nonhybrid PacBio-only assembly approach:

          Comment

          • phenotype
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2008
            • 8

            #6
            Why bother

            Hi Simon,

            You must be talking about the PacBioToCA script (http://sourceforge.netapps/mediawiki...tle=PacBioToCA) where you have to convert fastq files to .frg files and use those as input to Celera Assembler.

            But I agree with lhon. Why bother when there is a much simpler workflow using long reads only with HGAP in SMRT Analysis 2.0.0? (http://pacbiodevnet.com/)

            Comment

            • krobison
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2007
              • 734

              #7
              What scale genome are you sequencing?

              I've found the HGAP pipeline very useful, but you do need to get high coverage (100X+), which may not be economical on larger genomes. Illumina may also be valuable for correcting indels that Quiver doesn't clean up. I've had less luck with PacBioToCA, in part because some parts of the genomes of interest simply don't show up in the Illumina data.

              If HGAP isn't quite getting the genome closed due to coverage limitations, I have had luck closing some gaps by using Minimus2 to merge an Illumina assembly and a PacBio one. Directly assembling the two sets with MIRA or CA is on my to-do list.

              Comment

              • bonifera
                Member
                • May 2013
                • 10

                #8
                @phenotype

                We're trying to correct the PacBio long read and high error rate with the illumina short read and low error rate. These are the data sets that we have

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2




                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                45 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
                0 responses
                26 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                74 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                48 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...