Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nr23
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 42

    When to merge specify replicates

    Hi,

    I've got RNA-Seq data (pe 100bp) from several biological replicates and 11 different conditions and want to compare DE between conditions.

    I'm using the tuxedo suite (tophat, cufflinks) and wanted to know if I should run both replicates through tophat at the same time (specified as reps) , and use the output for cufflinks, or separately, and specify them as replicates in cufflinks?

    Additionally, the samples have been multiplexed (so each replicate is split over two lanes) - and I've currently merged the multiplexed reads for each replicate - do I lose power by doing this?

    Any advice would be great!

    Thanks,

    N
    Last edited by nr23; 06-05-2013, 01:49 AM.
  • mbblack
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 245

    #2
    Keep your biological replicates separate, and treat them as replicates. Otherwise, there was little point in even running them as you will have completely obscured the biological variation amongst your samples.

    Merging all your multiplexed lanes per sample prior to mapping them is fine and then you can map them all as the single sample they represent.
    Last edited by mbblack; 05-29-2013, 04:52 AM.
    Michael Black, Ph.D.
    ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

    Comment

    • mastal
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 666

      #3
      When to merge specify replicates

      How many lanes were used in all? Were all of the samples run in the same two lanes?

      You shouldn't combine biological replicates when running Tophat. You need the replicates in order to estimate the variance when calculating DE.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...