Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NGS_New_User
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 41

    Soap De Novo assembly interpretation

    Hello!

    I have run soap de novo on my assembly, and I have used different kmers. I have 12 assemblies and I need to choose the best one out of those 12.
    There are around 21 files created in each of the 12 assemblies.
    My question is, how should I interpret these files so as to choose the best assembly (things like n50, contig size-max,min; no. of contigs, coverage, assembly size etc).
    Which files should I use to get these results?
    The 21 files are:
    .arc
    .contig
    .contigIndex
    .edge
    .updated.edge
    .gapSeq
    .kmerFreq
    .links
    .markonEdge
    .newContigIndex
    .path
    .peGrads
    .preArc
    .preGraphBasic
    .readInGap
    .readOnContig
    .scaf
    .scaf_gap
    .scafSeq
    .vertex

    Thanks so much for the help!!
  • vivek_
    PhD Student
    • Jul 2012
    • 164

    #2
    I worked on SOAP assemblies a while ago and I think .scafseq is the fasta file of the scaffolded sequences and you'd likely be evaluating the contiguity metrics of your assemblies on this one. I can't remember the name for the contig fasta file.

    Comment

    • jebowers
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 19

      #3
      A file called .scafStatistics should have the basic information on N50, total size of assembly etc.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...