Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kath
    Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 24

    #1

    SOLiD paired end data and BWA - cleaning/mapping

    Hello everyone,

    I notice there has been the odd post about this general topic before but I am still confused!

    I have SOLiD single and paired end data which I would like to take through the following steps:
    1) Quality assessment - Fastqc
    2) Data cleaning - Quality trimming/removing adapters if necessary
    3) Mapping using BWA

    At the moment I am converting the csfasta and qual files in to double-encoded (fakespace) fastq files for BWA. I reverse the F5 reads so BWA treats them correctly. However, can the same fastq files be used with Fastqc? Also, can CutAdapt and fastq_quality_trimmer handle this format? If anyone else out there still uses SOLiD data and can give me some details of their workflows I would be very grateful.

    Best wishes,
    Kath
  • BrianJames
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    #2
    I used to work with SOLiD data, and I have to ask why you are going to all of this trouble. In my experience, the best way to map SOLiD data is to stay in colorspace, and use Bfast, or mapreads (part of lifescope/bioscope).


    Brian

    Comment

    • Kath
      Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 24

      #3
      Thanks for your reply. I have Lifescope mapped BAM files but I'm trying to dedup using Picard and am getting some very high duplication rates. I've been told that Picard seems to overestimate duplication rates in Lifescope mapped data and that BWA provides better compatibility with Picard. I did look into using Bfast but previous benchmarking studies suggested BWA would be better.

      Anyway, it looks like there is a script - solid-trimmer.py - that will do what I want.

      Comment

      • BrianJames
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        OK. Are you working with DNA-seq, or RNA-seq? If it is DNA seq, I would be worried about not working in colorspace, if it is RNA-seq, removing duplicates from SOLiD short read data may not be a good idea. Just my experience.

        Brian

        Comment

        • colindaven
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2008
          • 417

          #5
          We tested all SOLiD mappers very thoroughly, and NovoalignCS (commercial but not too expensive) won hands-down. I would really recommend it.

          BWA dropped color space support a long time ago and did not perform very well in terms of # mapped reads. Bfast wasn't much fun either.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            Yesterday, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          77 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...