Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • david.tamborero
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 60

    #1

    impact of mutations in splicing sites

    hi,

    I would like to score the impact of mutations occurring in gene regions that the variant effect predictor state as 'splice_variant'. Note that at this moment I do not want to predict whether the mutations create a cryptic splice site.

    I guess that there are some consensus sequences for both donor and acceptors, but I assume that it is more complicated that to construct the weight matrix by myself and check how it fits the wild type vs the mutant.

    Actually, I'm a bit lost. I found the Human Splice Finder and the MaxEntScan, but I am not sure of how to interpret their results, and -mainly- I would need some tool that can be run by script, since them are only available via manual entering of the data in the web.

    many thanks,
    david
  • m_two
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 50

    #2
    Ensembl VEP annotates mutations affecting the 5' and 3' and last two bases of the annotated introns as splice_donor_variant / splice_acceptor_variant, it does not predict de novo splice sites.

    To further filter the annotation you can try these four things:

    Eliminate variants exclusive to transcripts that are known pseudogenes or undergo NMD.

    Grab the nucleotide conservation scores from UCSC, real splice sites should have very high conservation scores.

    Eliminate splice variants that affect noncanonical GT AG splice sites.

    Filter common dbSNPs identified in 1000 Genomes data and NHLBI GO Exomes

    Comment

    • m_two
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 50

      #3
      If you are interested in de novo splice site potential you might be interested in this:
      SKIPPY_-_Exonic_Splice_Modulator_Scoring

      Web query:


      Home:


      Pub:
      Woolfe, A., Mullikin, J., and Elnitski, L. 2009. Genomic features defining exonic variants that modulate splicing. Genome Biology. 11:R20 [PubMed]



      See: Table S1 – List of 87 Synonymous and Missense variants that cause exon skipping ,used for analysis in this study. The variants are located in 40 genes and 47 individual ,exons. Variant locations are from human genome assembly hg18. References can be ,found in the main text of the paper.

      Additional file 1. List of 87 synonymous and missense splice-affecting genome variants (SAVs) that cause exon skipping used for analysis in this study. The variants are derived from [12,13,37,41,44,47,48,54-56,65-103].

      Format: PDF Size: 117KB Download file

      Comment

      • david.tamborero
        Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 60

        #4
        thanks for the answer!

        I think that I am going to score as 'highly deleterious' those mutations in 2 last/ 2 initial bases of introns in canonical splice sites, as I am currently doing with mutations in exons introducing a stop codon or a frameshift indel. For those mutations in other splice regions of the intron, for the moment I will consider them as having unknown effect, since I am not able to find a reliable score to classify their deleterious potential, and actually they should be not well catalogued -I guess- since I am dealing with exome seq data.

        Now I will move towards the assessment of how mutations in exons can create cryptic splice junctions. Absolutely, I will check skippy, it looks very nice!

        thanks again,
        best
        David

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...