Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • persorrels
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 6

    Minimum Read Length for BWA

    Hi all,

    I am preprocessing a dataset from a human sample sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Paired-end reads, 100bp each). I first trim each read based on quality. If the trimmed sequence is too short, I just discard it.

    My question is how do you pick the threshold length to discard? Would you discard reads shorter than 50, 40, or 30? What is the right approach to pick a threshold?

    I haven't been able to find any information on this on the web. (By the way, I am using BWA for alignment.)

    Thanks in advance.
    Last edited by persorrels; 10-03-2013, 03:38 PM. Reason: Clarification
  • vishnuamaram
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 41

    #2
    Hey persorrels,

    It looks like your approach of trimming the bases and discarding reads is not appropriate.

    Illumina gives more or less good quality reads except at the 1st 3-4 base positions and may be at last 2 base positions.

    --> It doesnt make sense of getting reads of size 30,40,50 after trimming 100 bp size reads.

    --> Just be concerned about the first few bases quality, if they are above Q20, you may proceed with alignment. if not above Q20, just trim those bases, that will do.

    Good luck ahead,
    Vishnu.

    Comment

    • persorrels
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 6

      #3
      Vishnu, thanks for your reply.

      It is true that most forward reads are of high quality. But the reverse reads aren't. Below are two examples:


      NTATATTTTCCTCTTGGTGGTATTGAAAACCAGTGAGCAGAGAGCATAAGAACAGAACTTCAAGACCGTGGCAGGAGCTTGTATTTGTACAGCACAAACCC
      +
      #+12??A;A>@>C>CBBBA=?CBBBBBBCBAAA@ABBBB>ABB;=BBBB<=A;=AA>==AAAB=>AAAA################################




      NAAGGAGCAGCTGCGTGCCGCGTGAGCTTTAGCAGGAGGACCAGTGATTAGCATTTACGATGCAAAGACAGAACAACTTCGTATAGGACTGTACCCCTGGA
      +
      #+1<?7AA<CBABBC<CCAAA=)?153*=A?A#####################################################################


      It is an extreme example, but you can recover a 18bp region (AA<CBABBC<CCAAA=) from the second read. I guess what you're saying is, if I had to trim a large portion of the read, I should ignore it entirely.

      Is that correct?

      Also, I suspect short reads like this will affect the performance of BWA. I want to understand how the read length distibution affects the performance of BWA.

      Any comments on that?

      Cheers,

      Per

      Comment

      • vishnuamaram
        Member
        • Jun 2013
        • 41

        #4
        Hey persorrels,

        what is the organism you have sequenced, what is the coverage.

        how much is the data size. how many reads does your data have ?

        why are you seeing individual reads.

        Initially, you need to run a quality check on your entire reads together of Read1 and Read2 individually.
        then see the quality output chart, then proceed for trimming.

        Best,
        vishnu.

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          You can usually use the default minimum size of whatever trimmer you're using as a guide. Often minimum sizes of 20 or 30 are used (I wouldn't bother going much lower than that, since anything shorter will probably just become a multi-mapper).

          Comment

          • persorrels
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2013
            • 6

            #6
            Human, 10x exome. Total sequence size is about 30Gb. 100bp per read. Attached are some sample statistics from reverse reads.
            Attached Files

            Comment

            • vishnuamaram
              Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 41

              #7
              Hey persorrels,

              If i was in your place, i proceed this way.

              I suggest you trim the first 4 bases and run FASTQC on the trimmed file and checked the QC chart.

              --> If you see the mean quality- the blue line it falls more or less near 30, above 28.
              --> The median quality- the red line is above 30 for all bases.

              That means, only certain reads bases of the file are not of good quality.

              But, any how trim the first 4 bases, align and see.
              Do it. You will learn a lot by going.

              Best,
              Vishnu.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              45 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...