Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brett Bowman
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 2

    Question about Delta-Filter for MUMmer

    I'm trying to associate some genomic contigs with one of several references using Mummer. What I can't seem to figure out is how to successfully remove all of the spurious hits.

    I align the sequences with nucmer:
    nucmer -p <output> <reference> <query>
    then remove the short and low-quality hits with delta-filter
    delta-filter -l <length> -i <quality>
    That gets me ~90% of the way there, but I still have some query contigs aligning to multiple references that I need to remove - primarily those around rDNA genes. I'm getting hits to multiple references for these contigs, but I can't figure out what I'm supposed to do to get rid of them.

    Delta-filter has options "-r", "-q", and "-g" which appear to address these sorts of things, but they are not documented nor explained well, and they don't generate the sort of output that I am expect - some pseudo-hits still remain.

    Can someone familiar with Nucmer/MUMmer please explain how to filter out the secondary hits from some of my query sequences, or explain what the above options in Delta-Filter are supposed to do?

    Sincerely,
    Brett
  • andylemire
    Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 14

    #2
    I've worked a little bit with MUMmer/nucmer/promer, and I typically use delta-filter -1 instead of -r, -q, or -g. This should yield a 1 to 1 mapping of reference and query sequences.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...