Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slois
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 2

    #1

    VarScan2. Strange behaviour of somatic-p-value

    Hi community of SEQanswers,

    I'm running varscan2 for somatic mutation calling following the commands of its documentation: mpileup + varscan somatic

    In order to test the effect of --somatic-p-value parameter in the number of variants called by varscan somatic, I have tried different p-values and logically I obtain different number of variants in the final output. However, checking the differents outputs I see that the value of the field somatic p-value (col. 15 in the tabulated output or value SPV of col. INFO in the VCF format) is greater than the specified threshold. I expected that all the somatic variants of the output has a somatic-p-value below my threshold.

    Is there any reason to explain this behaviour? Am I doing something wrong? I would like to know whether --somatic-p-value parameter is filtering variants according its value or not.

    Thank you in advance for you answers,
    Last edited by slois; 04-03-2014, 08:01 AM.
  • slois
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 2

    #2
    Hi,

    According the documentation:
    --p-value - P-value threshold to call a heterozygote [0.99]
    --somatic-p-value - P-value threshold to call a somatic site [0.05]

    Are these parameters filtering the variants identified according its corresponding values?

    Different tests applied using different somatic p-values: (outputs are modified to fit in this post). Last two columns are the variant-p-value and somatic-p-value:

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 1
    result1.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result1.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090
    result1.snp:chr1 1111272 C T 35 2 5,41% C 55 16 22,54% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0182

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.05 (Default)
    result2.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result2.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090
    result2.snp:chr1 1111272 C T 35 2 5,41% C 55 16 22,54% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0182

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.01
    result3.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368
    result3.snp:chr1 1111270 C T 36 2 5,26% C 52 17 24,64% Y Somatic 1.0 0.0090

    Results obtained for --somatic-p-value = 0.001
    result4.snp:chr1 1019753 A G 10 0 0% A 8 2 20% R Somatic 1.0 0.2368

    Thank you

    Comment

    • vd4mindia
      Member
      • May 2013
      • 40

      #3
      I also have a same question,

      I have also ran the VarScan2 on my normal/tumor pair with p-value as 0.1 somatic p-value 0.001 and then ran the somatic filter with parameters -min-strands2 2 -min-avg-qual 30. I get very less variants that are significant. I get around 250 variants. Can anyone tell me what is the standard threshold for the p-value and somatic pvalue? Which is the paramter you have been supplying?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...