Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brianlamx
    Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 20

    Anyone here uses MUMmerGPU?

    Hi I have problem building suffix trees using MUMmerGPU with human chromosomes. I tried with chr1 and chr22 but no luck so far. When I tried with an artificial sequence it works. Is it that the Ns are stopping it from working properly?

    TA

    B
  • Torst
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 275

    #2
    Originally posted by brianlamx View Post
    Hi I have problem building suffix trees using MUMmerGPU with human chromosomes. I tried with chr1 and chr22 but no luck so far.
    Does it work with regular MUMmer?

    Will MUMmerGPU really offer much improvement in speed?

    Comment

    • spenthil
      Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 44

      #3


      (from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/474)
      --
      Senthil Palanisami

      Comment

      • Melissa
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 124

        #4
        Originally posted by brianlamx View Post
        Hi I have problem building suffix trees using MUMmerGPU with human chromosomes. I tried with chr1 and chr22 but no luck so far. When I tried with an artificial sequence it works. Is it that the Ns are stopping it from working properly?

        TA

        B
        The Ns won't affect. Just wanna check with you that you're using only one sequence to construct the suffix tree. I think MummerGPU don't support multiple sequences as reference.

        Comment

        • Torst
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2008
          • 275

          #5
          Are you mapping READS to the human genome, or comparing contigs?

          If using reads, there are much better tools like BWA etc that will give 1000x speedups compared to Mummer. If mapping large sequences, the GPUMummer gives no speedup compared to Mummer (see the graph).

          Don't put yourself through pain unless you are forced to!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...