Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tethys
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 1

    WGCNA eigengene correlation

    I'm using the WGCNA package in R to analyse RNA sequencing data. I've hit a point follwing the tutorial, and adapting it to my data, where I don't understand the rationale behind one of the steps, implying that I am perhaps missing something fundamental about the process. I've read the main publication associated with the pakcage and haven't found the answer to my question. If anyone could help me figure out what I'm missing, I would be very grateful.

    In the tutorial, the similarity between module eigengenes is calculated as the correlation coefficient between pairs of eigengenes. Similarly, the function mergeCloseModules also uses the correlation coefficient, and as far as I can tell this cannot be changed. It seems to me that the absolute value of the correlation coefficient should be used instead. The eigengene of a module is simply the first Principle Component of that module's expression matrix. As I understand PCA, the direction of a PC is arbitrary, which means that the sign of the correlation coefficient between eigengenes should also be arbitrary. Strongly negatively correlated eigengenes are therefore just as similar as strongly positively correlated ones. If the signed correlation coefficient is used, then strongly negatively correlated genes will be considered highly dissimilar.

    Any help filling in my understanding would be greatly appreciated,

    Eric

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    Yesterday, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
    by SEQadmin2


    With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


    Introduction

    Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
    05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
37 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
43 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...