Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cb1025
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 2

    #1

    Techniques for estimating local alignment score distribution parameters

    To score a sequence alignment, the distribution of local alignment scores involving random sequences is used as a statistical reference.

    What are some current techniques used by computational biologists in estimating the parameters of such distributions? How does this distribution vary with different species? Or maybe I should ask: how do we take into account of the differences between species when modeling these distributions?

    I recently came across the "island method" approach but I don't quite understand it. > < Could someone please offer a short explanation?

    Are there example implementations or opensource codes of these parameter estimation methods I could check out?

    Thank you very much
  • gtuckerkellogg
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 2

    #2
    I think you are referring to the island method described in Altschul, S.F., Bundschuh, R., Olsen, R. & Hwa, T. The estimation of statistical parameters for local alignment score distributions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 351–361 (2001). I've seen it used in other papers, such as the original miRDeep reference, but haven't seen the implementation (as code) in any paper.

    Comment

    • cb1025
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2015
      • 2

      #3
      Yes, thank you! MiRDeep used it to estimate parameters for the Gumbel distribution. However, I have not been able to find a full, step-by-step example, let along one with implementation details.

      I have also been looking at some of Poleksic's work such as: Island method for estimating the statistical significance of profile-profile alignment scores. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 20;10:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-112.

      I feel I also need to read up on some the basic statistics behind it (e.g. Gumbel EJ: Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press, New York, NY; 1958.) to really understand what's going on.

      Please do advise on a good approach for a starter like me! Thanks again

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...