Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bugbitten
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 3

    Error in microbial count object: Error in hatmatrix/non-conformable arguments

    I imported a phyloseq object to DESEQ2 for obtaining the log2fold change in the number of OTU's per sample. My condition is the disease_stat: cancer, healthy, adenoma

    Following is the code i used:

    phyloseq_to_deseq2(biom_otu_tax, ~disease_stat)
    cts=counts(DESeq2BIOM)
    geoMeans = apply(cts, 1, function(row) if (all(row == 0)) 0 else exp(mean(log(row[row != 0]))))
    DESeq2BIOM = estimateSizeFactors(DESeq2BIOM, geoMeans = geoMeans)
    #It stopped working after this point
    DESeq2BIOM = estimateDispersions(DESeq2BIOM)
    DESeq2BIOMRES = DESeq(DESeq2BIOM,test = "Wald", betaPrior = "FALSE")
    DESeq2BIOMRES = DESeq(DESeq2BIOM,test = "Wald")

    The error I get is Error in t(hatmatrix %*% t(y)) :
    "error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function 't': Error in hatmatrix %*% t(y) : non-conformable arguments"

    I browsed a few other solutions before posting a question: http://seqanswers.com/forums/archive...p/t-46009.html
    They did not address my issue.

    What does this error indicate? Help in troubleshooting much appreciated!
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I moved this to Bioinformatics where you'll have better luck.

    Comment

    • bugbitten
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Error in hatmatrix %*% t(y) : non-conformable arguments"

      Thanks for moving it here. New to the community and would appreciate some direction to troubleshoot the issue!

      Comment

      • Michael Love
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 333

        #4
        What version of DESeq2 software are you using? Type: sessionInfo(). The latest release is 1.8, so I'd recommend first checking if updating helps.

        Note that DESeq() includes estimateDispersions() as a step, so you can just proceed from your custom size factor calculation to DESeq().

        Comment

        • Gorgon
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 2

          #5
          Hello,

          I happen to have a similar problem to what the original poster had:

          > DiffAbund <- DESeq(DiffAbund, test="Wald", fitType="parametric")
          estimating size factors
          estimating dispersions
          gene-wise dispersion estimates
          Error in t(hatmatrix %*% t(y)) :
          error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function 't': Error in hatmatrix %*% t(y) : non-conformable arguments



          The DESeq2 version I'm running is 1.8.2.

          Any suggestions on what might be the problem and how to solve it? I have a bunch of variables in the model, so I guess taking a few out could solve the issue with the matrix operations, but I'm trying to avoid that. Any help would be very mucho appreciated.

          Comment

          • cam687
            Junior Member
            • Dec 2016
            • 2

            #6
            I know this is an old thread, but in my case the error was because I had collapsed technical replicates

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...