Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Studentlost
    Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 28

    #1

    STAR Alignment parameters for varying complexity in library

    I'm working with TruSeq data for the mouse genome, with one of the groups having a low complexity library, and the other two having a high complexity library. The reads are single end, 50 bp.

    What would be the best parameters to set in order to handle the duplicates in the low complexity samples, and help normalize the alignments for downstream analysis?

    Should I pay any attention to parameters involved intron sizes and gaps? How should I set the multimapping and mismatch parameters? Also, should I reduce the value for seedSearchStartLMax? If the reads are fragmented into smaller sizes, it will increase the amount of multi mapped reads, which I don't necessarily want? Any benefit to that? What's a good value for this?

    Also, would splicing or isoform detection be worth pursuing with reads this short and the fact that one group has a low complexity library?

    I'm using Gencode's M8 build with the primary assembly and primary annotations.

    Any suggestions and help would be really appreciated! Thank you!
  • alexdobin
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 161

    #2
    Originally posted by Studentlost View Post
    I'm working with TruSeq data for the mouse genome, with one of the groups having a low complexity library, and the other two having a high complexity library. The reads are single end, 50 bp.

    What would be the best parameters to set in order to handle the duplicates in the low complexity samples, and help normalize the alignments for downstream analysis?

    Should I pay any attention to parameters involved intron sizes and gaps? How should I set the multimapping and mismatch parameters? Also, should I reduce the value for seedSearchStartLMax? If the reads are fragmented into smaller sizes, it will increase the amount of multi mapped reads, which I don't necessarily want? Any benefit to that? What's a good value for this?

    Also, would splicing or isoform detection be worth pursuing with reads this short and the fact that one group has a low complexity library?

    I'm using Gencode's M8 build with the primary assembly and primary annotations.

    Any suggestions and help would be really appreciated! Thank you!
    Hi @Studentlost,

    I do not think you should tweak mapping parameters for low complexity libraries. The presence of duplicates does not affect mapping since each read is mapped independently. --seedSearchStartLmax affects sensitivity of the search, but it will do it in the same for low or high complexity libraries. I would reduce it to ~30 for 50b reads.

    Quantification of genes/transcripts will, of course, be a problem for low complexity libraries.

    Cheers
    Alex

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...