Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fungs
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 10

    Blast raw score calculation

    Hello,

    I know this sounds strange but I am having problems to validate the BLAST raw alignment scores (not the bit scores). Here an example alignment:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Query: 100009 (Length=100)

    Hit: NZ_ABBZ01004690 gi|153879981|ref|NZ_ABBZ01004690.1| Beggiatoa sp. PS, whole genome shotgun sequence
    Length=280

    Score = 176 bits (194), Expected = 6e-42
    Identities = 99/100 (99%), Gaps = 0/100 (0%)
    Strand=Plus/Minus

    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA

    -------------------------------------------------------

    My scoring matrix is:
    match: 2
    mismatch: -3
    gap open: 5
    gap extension: 2

    Following the formula from the NCBI web site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Educatio...t_Scores2.html (and what other aligners produce as raw score) this makes

    99*2 - 3 = 195 and not 194 like BLAST says:

    <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
    <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
    <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
    <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
    <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
    <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
    <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
    <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
    <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
    <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
    <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
    <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
    <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
    <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>

    In fact I noticed that all BLAST raw scores are even! I am using BLAST version 2.2.22+. Do I miss an import point here?
  • robs
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 116

    #2
    Did you try to use BLAST+ instead? If the problem does occur with BLAST+, I would switch. You might also want to update to the latest BLAST version.

    Comment

    • fungs
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Yes, I am using BLAST+. I am currently running the latest version to see whether it makes any difference. Anyhow, this shoudn't be if it is really a bug. I couldn't find anything about it in the change logs from 2.2.22+ to 2.2.24+ so I rather think that it will give the same results with the latest version. What do you mean by "you should switch"?

      Comment

      • robs
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 116

        #4
        If the raw score is a huge issue for you, you might want to consider alternative alignment programs (switch to an alternative program).
        You could also try to write the NCBI people who wrote the BLAST+ paper.

        Comment

        • fungs
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 10

          #5
          Yes thanks, I counterchecked with the latest BLAST+ version and found the same issue. The raw score is important to me because when I compare different aligners using the same scoring scheme should result in more or less the same alignments with the same raw scores.

          Another point is that BLAST bit scores are calculated from the raw scores. This would mean that also the bit scores are slightly wrong!

          I will write them an email, unfortunately they don't have a developers mailing list at the NCBI...

          Comment

          • fungs
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 10

            #6
            Just to let you know: Here is some evidence on the issue. I checked different versions and engines of NCBI BLAST. This seems to be an optimization in the code that is on purpose. The effect is that raw score can differ up to 3 points from real score.

            blast2.2.24+:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================
            blast2.2.24:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28581e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================

            blast2.2.24-legacy:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>177.115</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>195</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>3.36455e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            49 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...