Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fungs
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 10

    #1

    Blast raw score calculation

    Hello,

    I know this sounds strange but I am having problems to validate the BLAST raw alignment scores (not the bit scores). Here an example alignment:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Query: 100009 (Length=100)

    Hit: NZ_ABBZ01004690 gi|153879981|ref|NZ_ABBZ01004690.1| Beggiatoa sp. PS, whole genome shotgun sequence
    Length=280

    Score = 176 bits (194), Expected = 6e-42
    Identities = 99/100 (99%), Gaps = 0/100 (0%)
    Strand=Plus/Minus

    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA

    -------------------------------------------------------

    My scoring matrix is:
    match: 2
    mismatch: -3
    gap open: 5
    gap extension: 2

    Following the formula from the NCBI web site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Educatio...t_Scores2.html (and what other aligners produce as raw score) this makes

    99*2 - 3 = 195 and not 194 like BLAST says:

    <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
    <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
    <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
    <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
    <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
    <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
    <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
    <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
    <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
    <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
    <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
    <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
    <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
    <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>

    In fact I noticed that all BLAST raw scores are even! I am using BLAST version 2.2.22+. Do I miss an import point here?
  • robs
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 116

    #2
    Did you try to use BLAST+ instead? If the problem does occur with BLAST+, I would switch. You might also want to update to the latest BLAST version.

    Comment

    • fungs
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Yes, I am using BLAST+. I am currently running the latest version to see whether it makes any difference. Anyhow, this shoudn't be if it is really a bug. I couldn't find anything about it in the change logs from 2.2.22+ to 2.2.24+ so I rather think that it will give the same results with the latest version. What do you mean by "you should switch"?

      Comment

      • robs
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 116

        #4
        If the raw score is a huge issue for you, you might want to consider alternative alignment programs (switch to an alternative program).
        You could also try to write the NCBI people who wrote the BLAST+ paper.

        Comment

        • fungs
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 10

          #5
          Yes thanks, I counterchecked with the latest BLAST+ version and found the same issue. The raw score is important to me because when I compare different aligners using the same scoring scheme should result in more or less the same alignments with the same raw scores.

          Another point is that BLAST bit scores are calculated from the raw scores. This would mean that also the bit scores are slightly wrong!

          I will write them an email, unfortunately they don't have a developers mailing list at the NCBI...

          Comment

          • fungs
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 10

            #6
            Just to let you know: Here is some evidence on the issue. I checked different versions and engines of NCBI BLAST. This seems to be an optimization in the code that is on purpose. The effect is that raw score can differ up to 3 points from real score.

            blast2.2.24+:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================
            blast2.2.24:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28581e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================

            blast2.2.24-legacy:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>177.115</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>195</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>3.36455e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...