Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fungs
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 10

    #1

    Blast raw score calculation

    Hello,

    I know this sounds strange but I am having problems to validate the BLAST raw alignment scores (not the bit scores). Here an example alignment:

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Query: 100009 (Length=100)

    Hit: NZ_ABBZ01004690 gi|153879981|ref|NZ_ABBZ01004690.1| Beggiatoa sp. PS, whole genome shotgun sequence
    Length=280

    Score = 176 bits (194), Expected = 6e-42
    Identities = 99/100 (99%), Gaps = 0/100 (0%)
    Strand=Plus/Minus

    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
    TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA

    -------------------------------------------------------

    My scoring matrix is:
    match: 2
    mismatch: -3
    gap open: 5
    gap extension: 2

    Following the formula from the NCBI web site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Educatio...t_Scores2.html (and what other aligners produce as raw score) this makes

    99*2 - 3 = 195 and not 194 like BLAST says:

    <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
    <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
    <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
    <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
    <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
    <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
    <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
    <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
    <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
    <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
    <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
    <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
    <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
    <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>

    In fact I noticed that all BLAST raw scores are even! I am using BLAST version 2.2.22+. Do I miss an import point here?
  • robs
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 116

    #2
    Did you try to use BLAST+ instead? If the problem does occur with BLAST+, I would switch. You might also want to update to the latest BLAST version.

    Comment

    • fungs
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Yes, I am using BLAST+. I am currently running the latest version to see whether it makes any difference. Anyhow, this shoudn't be if it is really a bug. I couldn't find anything about it in the change logs from 2.2.22+ to 2.2.24+ so I rather think that it will give the same results with the latest version. What do you mean by "you should switch"?

      Comment

      • robs
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 116

        #4
        If the raw score is a huge issue for you, you might want to consider alternative alignment programs (switch to an alternative program).
        You could also try to write the NCBI people who wrote the BLAST+ paper.

        Comment

        • fungs
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 10

          #5
          Yes thanks, I counterchecked with the latest BLAST+ version and found the same issue. The raw score is important to me because when I compare different aligners using the same scoring scheme should result in more or less the same alignments with the same raw scores.

          Another point is that BLAST bit scores are calculated from the raw scores. This would mean that also the bit scores are slightly wrong!

          I will write them an email, unfortunately they don't have a developers mailing list at the NCBI...

          Comment

          • fungs
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 10

            #6
            Just to let you know: Here is some evidence on the issue. I checked different versions and engines of NCBI BLAST. This seems to be an optimization in the code that is on purpose. The effect is that raw score can differ up to 3 points from real score.

            blast2.2.24+:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213077892943</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28580662796915e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>1</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>100</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>108</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>9</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_gaps>0</Hsp_gaps>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGCGTGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCTGTTCTGTTCCATTGATCTATATCTCTGTTTTGGTACCAGTACCATGCTGTTTTGGTTACTGTAGCCTTGTAGTATAGTTTGAAGTCAGGTAGTGTGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================
            blast2.2.24:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>176.213</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>194</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>6.28581e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            ================================================================================

            blast2.2.24-legacy:

            * * * <Parameters_expect>10000</Parameters_expect>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-match>2</Parameters_sc-match>
            * * * <Parameters_sc-mismatch>-3</Parameters_sc-mismatch>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-open>5</Parameters_gap-open>
            * * * <Parameters_gap-extend>2</Parameters_gap-extend>
            * * * <Parameters_filter>F</Parameters_filter>

            * * * * * * * <Hsp_num>1</Hsp_num>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_bit-score>177.115</Hsp_bit-score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_score>195</Hsp_score>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_evalue>3.36455e-42</Hsp_evalue>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-from>100</Hsp_query-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-to>1</Hsp_query-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-from>9</Hsp_hit-from>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-to>108</Hsp_hit-to>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_query-frame>1</Hsp_query-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_hit-frame>-1</Hsp_hit-frame>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_identity>99</Hsp_identity>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_positive>99</Hsp_positive>
            * * * * * * * <Hsp_align-len>100</Hsp_align-len>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_qseq>TCACGCTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_qseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_hseq>TCACACTACCTGACTTCAAACTATACTACAAGGCTACAGTAACCAAAACAGCATGGTACTGGTACCAAAACAGAGATATAGATCAATGGAACAGAACAGA</Hsp_hseq>
            * * * * * * *
            <Hsp_midline>|||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            </Hsp_midline>

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...