Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • candida
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 2

    Trimmomatic adapter file vs Custom made file

    Hello everyone,


    I am working with TruSeq paired end data (150bp). I have a doubt regarding the adapter file provided in Trimmomatic for trimming adapters.

    According to the Trimmomatic provided adapter file "TruSeq3-PE-2.fa" the reverse complement of index adapter sequence is used for trimming reads from R2 file and the universal adapter is used for trimming reads from R1 file.
    >PrefixPE/1 TACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT

    >PrefixPE/2 GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT

    >PE1 TACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT

    >PE1_rc AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTA

    >PE2 GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT

    >PE2_rc AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCAC

    However, it looks like that for my data the actual sequences of the index adapter is in the R1 file and the reverse complement of the universal adapter is in the R2 file.

    This information was also provided to me by Illumina support team.


    Therefore I prepared my adapter file as follows (I'm using the full sequence):
    >PrefixPE/1 AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCACATCACGATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG (index adapter)

    >PrefixPE/2 AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTAGATCTCGGTGGTCGCCGTATCATT ( reverse complement of universal adapter)

    >PE1 AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCACATCACGATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG

    >PE1_rc CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGTGATGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT (revcomp of PE1)

    >PE2 AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTAGATCTCGGTGGTCGCCGTATCATT

    >PE2_rc AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT (revcomp of PE2)

    Please let me know if this adapter file I prepared is fine or is the Trimmomatic adapter file better and needs to be used always.
    I tried my custom made file as well as the Trimmomatic recommended file and found that both removed adapters when checked using FASTQC!!

    Please correct me or let me know if I'm missing something!
    Appreciate your help and guidance!
    Thanks,
    Candida
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For reference cross posted: https://www.biostars.org/p/250425

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...