Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ErikFas
    Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 86

    #1

    Choosing experimental models for three-condition DE analysis

    I recently got a new project to work on regarding differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data, and it's slightly different to what I've done previously in that it has three conditions, rather than just two. It's basically three isogenic cell lines (with several replicates each) that differ only by their expression levels of a single, important gene (which has been verified experimentally by other collaborators). The first cell line (A) has very low expression of this gene, the second one (B) is moderately expressed and the third one (C) is highly expressed (relatively speaking). The question is which genes (if any) are differentially expressed in regards to this more-or-less linear single-gene expression variation.

    I have so far only worked on simple two-condition DE-analysis (what the edgeR documentation terms "classical" analysis), and so I haven't really experienced this case before. I have not used GLMs before, and I'm wondering what the appropriate experimental design for this sort of question would be. I could do the "classical" analysis for A vs. B and A vs. C, for example, and see if the same DEGs from A-B are more differentially expressed in the A-C case. I have done this in a preliminary way, and it does indeed seem to be the case that most of the DEGs follow the trend of higher expression --> higher fold change. It occured to me, however, that this GLM-thing I heard about might be better suited. Seeing as I haven't used it before, I quickly skimmed the edgeR document, concluded that I indeed lacked knowledge of the general theory, and went here.

    What is the experimental design I'm looking for here? Should I read up more carefully on GLMs and their use, or do I stick with the classical analysis? If GLMs are the way to go, is there a "beginner's guide"-kind of explanation somewhere for somebody new to the idea? While I've certainly learnt a lot of statistics during my PhD, yet I have little formal training, so I'd like to get an intuitive concept down before I dig into the details.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
43 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...