Ditto, it is a pain also for us, would be very nice to have it fixed in GATK. They say in http://getsatisfaction.com/gsa/topic...ent_i_d_events that this is a buggy CIGAR but I doubt - there is nothing to say adjacent I/Ds are forbidden. New aligners that are not based on Smith-Waterman or BW can generate valid alignments with CIGARs like this. Should we ask them again on the GATK forum to have an other look?
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Stampy->GATK
Ah, OK excellent. Thanks so much, I'll give version 13 a try. Yes, I really want to be able to maintain use of stampy as the aligner- it does an excellent job with highly polymorphic alignments.Originally posted by ameynert View PostYes, I was using Stampy 0.1.12 to generate the alignments. The problem is fixed in Stampy 0.1.13 as far as I can tell. I've generally been pretty happy with the indels generated from a Stampy > realign > score recal > unifiedgenotyper pipeline.
Comment
-
Exact same problem
I'm using version 13 of Stampy, but have exactly the same problem when trying to call indels with -glm INDEL, namely:
"SAM/BAM file SAMFileReader{/Volumes/Data/sherlock/Pseudomonas/All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam} is malformed: Adjacent I/D events in read MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0"
The reads in question have the following alignments:
MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 83 NC_002516.2 33359 5 4M4D2M11I19M = 33371 -16 TGAACCGCTCTTCTGATCTCGGCGGTGTATTCGCCG =8?8=C7HAF?AF<;2=G@G:CH:3?/,4:8A1;3: RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:=7?5A@4A@BA@B:@@7D@D@BA@BB338:86868B PQ:i:431 UQ:i:23 XQ:i:228
MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 163 NC_002516.2 33371 5 18M11I6D7M = 33359 16 CGGCGGTGTATTCGCCGAGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTG @FGEFIBKB?DBHJGHKCID=FJJ9FB9K0KCIKCB RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 SM:i:0 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:IHIGFGIIIDGGGEEIIBDI@DGG8G?DG2GDGGGD PQ:i:431 UQ:i:42 XQ:i:204
The file worked fine for calling SNPs. Does anyone know a fix or workaround? Can one simply:
samtools view All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam | grep -v "MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0" > fixed.sam
add in the header, index and rerun? I guess I'll try.
Comment
-
I've set it running, and it has passed the point of failure, so potentially looks good. If it fails elsewhere, I'll follow up, otherwise assume that it worked.Originally posted by NGSfan View PostHi Gavin,
try adding -rf BadCigar and see what happens.
Let me know if it works for you
Many thanks for the help.
Comment
-
Same problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--ThanksLast edited by dustinlong; 01-21-2012, 10:15 AM.
Comment
-
With version GenomeAnalysisTK-1.5-32, I still have the same problem. Using the -rf BadCigar allows the UnifiedGenotyper analysis to proceed.Originally posted by dustinlong View PostSame problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--Thanks
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
The immune system’s power comes from its genetic diversity, allowing myriad threats to be neutralized through first recognizing foreign antigens. That diversity is also what makes the immune system so difficult to study. Recent advances in sequencing technology and computational biology, however, are giving researchers new tools to understand immune responses and immune-related diseases in greater detail.
This convergence of genetics, immunology, and computation...-
Channel: Articles
09-01-2026, 05:41 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 09-03-2026, 10:22 AM
|
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
09-03-2026, 10:22 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 09-02-2026, 12:32 PM
|
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
09-02-2026, 12:32 PM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
0 responses
66 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
Comment