Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • szilva
    Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 16

    #31
    Ditto, it is a pain also for us, would be very nice to have it fixed in GATK. They say in http://getsatisfaction.com/gsa/topic...ent_i_d_events that this is a buggy CIGAR but I doubt - there is nothing to say adjacent I/Ds are forbidden. New aligners that are not based on Smith-Waterman or BW can generate valid alignments with CIGARs like this. Should we ask them again on the GATK forum to have an other look?

    Comment

    • siwright
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 3

      #32
      Stampy->GATK

      Originally posted by ameynert View Post
      Yes, I was using Stampy 0.1.12 to generate the alignments. The problem is fixed in Stampy 0.1.13 as far as I can tell. I've generally been pretty happy with the indels generated from a Stampy > realign > score recal > unifiedgenotyper pipeline.
      Ah, OK excellent. Thanks so much, I'll give version 13 a try. Yes, I really want to be able to maintain use of stampy as the aligner- it does an excellent job with highly polymorphic alignments.

      Comment

      • Gavin_Sherlock
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 3

        #33
        Exact same problem

        I'm using version 13 of Stampy, but have exactly the same problem when trying to call indels with -glm INDEL, namely:

        "SAM/BAM file SAMFileReader{/Volumes/Data/sherlock/Pseudomonas/All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam} is malformed: Adjacent I/D events in read MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0"

        The reads in question have the following alignments:

        MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 83 NC_002516.2 33359 5 4M4D2M11I19M = 33371 -16 TGAACCGCTCTTCTGATCTCGGCGGTGTATTCGCCG =8?8=C7HAF?AF<;2=G@G:CH:3?/,4:8A1;3: RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:=7?5A@4A@BA@B:@@7D@D@BA@BB338:86868B PQ:i:431 UQ:i:23 XQ:i:228
        MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 163 NC_002516.2 33371 5 18M11I6D7M = 33359 16 CGGCGGTGTATTCGCCGAGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTG @FGEFIBKB?DBHJGHKCID=FJJ9FB9K0KCIKCB RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 SM:i:0 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:IHIGFGIIIDGGGEEIIBDI@DGG8G?DG2GDGGGD PQ:i:431 UQ:i:42 XQ:i:204


        The file worked fine for calling SNPs. Does anyone know a fix or workaround? Can one simply:

        samtools view All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam | grep -v "MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0" > fixed.sam

        add in the header, index and rerun? I guess I'll try.

        Comment

        • NGSfan
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 181

          #34
          Hi Gavin,

          try adding -rf BadCigar and see what happens.

          Let me know if it works for you

          Comment

          • Gavin_Sherlock
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2011
            • 3

            #35
            Originally posted by NGSfan View Post
            Hi Gavin,

            try adding -rf BadCigar and see what happens.

            Let me know if it works for you
            I've set it running, and it has passed the point of failure, so potentially looks good. If it fails elsewhere, I'll follow up, otherwise assume that it worked.

            Many thanks for the help.

            Comment

            • dustinlong
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 1

              #36
              Same problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--Thanks
              Last edited by dustinlong; 01-21-2012, 10:15 AM.

              Comment

              • MQ-BCBB
                Member
                • May 2009
                • 25

                #37
                Originally posted by dustinlong View Post
                Same problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--Thanks
                With version GenomeAnalysisTK-1.5-32, I still have the same problem. Using the -rf BadCigar allows the UnifiedGenotyper analysis to proceed.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  Yesterday, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                8 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                15 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                0 responses
                15 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...