Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • maxz411
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2020
    • 7

    #1

    Incorrect bbmap quality trimming

    I am using bbmap to trim bases below a certain quality threshold in a FASTQ file. The file looks fine to me in terms of quality scores, but when I run bbmap it trims almost all the bases away and seems to leave just one base per read, despite most of the bases meeting the quality threshold.

    I am not sure if this makes any difference, but this is a FASTQ file generated by merging overlapping paired-end reads and adjusting quality scores to reflect this with SeqPrep. As a result, most of the quality scores are high (lowercase ASCII characters) and I am setting a trim threshold of 59. Nonetheless, many more of the bases in the file should meet this threshold than what bbmap is outputting.

    In case it is helpful, I pasted my command below. I also pasted a few lines of the FASTQ input.

    Code:
    ./reformat.sh in=./samples/B10C_merge.fq out=./samples/B10C_trim.fq qtrim=rl trimq=59 qin=33 qout=33
    Code:
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:15470:1423 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    GATCTGTTGCTGCCCCAGGATGTTGAGGAGTTTTTTGAAGGCCCAAGTGAAGCCCTCCAAGTGTTAGGAGCTCCTGCAGCACAGGCCCTGCCCCAGCTACTCCATGGCCCCCGTCATCTTTTGTCCCTTCTCAAAAAACTTACCAGGGCAACTATGGCTTCCACCTGGGCTTCCTGCAGTC
    +
    hhiijlllllllmmnnnnnnnnooooooomnooonnnmnoooonnoooooonnnooonoooooooooooonlooooooooonnnnmmmnnnnonnnoooooooonnnnnnlmnnnnnoononnonoononnnnnooolnooooooonnnnnoooooooonnnnnnnnnmmmjmmmmijjij
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:18370:1751 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    TTTGATGATGGCTGTCATGTCTGGGAGCCTGTGGCTGAAGAAAAAGGAGGAGAGAGATGGCAGAAGCTGCTGGTGGCGGGGCTTCTTCTGCAGGATGGAAATGGCTCTGGACTTGGCGGTGGCTGATGCCCCTCGCTCTGCTGCCGCTTGGTTCTGGACAGCAGCCGGGTAATGGCTGCTGCGGCGGCTGCTGGATGGTTGCAGCGACTGGGCCTGCTTCTCCTCAGCAGCCA
    +
    fggggkkkkkkkllllllkgllmmmmlllmmmgmmmlmmmmmmmmlllmlmmnmmmmnnnmnmmnmnnnmlmnnnmnmmnmnmnoonooomooomoonnmonooojnnolnonnnnlnmbhkojmWWljnnmkmjiUjcmlllnniigllnahWaWmWmmgkhllmmnn`jninnmikehhkagdTj`T`UUa`T`WbWaTThhh`TgfgklekkkeVhVV[gU^UQZPZQfO
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:12451:2026 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    TTTGATGATGGCTGTCATGGCAAAGGGAGGAGGACAGGCTTCTCCGTCCCCAGGAAGCAACTGGAGGCCCAGCTGAGCCCAGCTCTGCCTCAGCTTCCCCATCTGTAAAATGGGGTGATGGGCACCAGGCGGTAGGTGCAGCCTCACTGTCTTCTTGCCCCCAGCGGAGCTGATGGAGCGGGCCGCGGTGCCACCCCTTTGGCCGGCCCTGTACCCACCAGGCCGCAGCTCCCTGCACCACGCCCAGCAGCTGCAGCTCTTCTCCTCAGCAGCC
    +
    CABCCFFFFFFFGGGGGGGGGGHHmmlmllllllmmhllmmmmmkammllmmllmmlmmmmmlmmmljlllmmlmmmmllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlllklmnnnmmmnngnmmmkmmnnnknnooooomonoonljnnnnnlmmmnnnnnnnoonlmknnmlmmmmmlmmdhjTllmmmmllUhllgkmlmmmlllmlmllllllllmllllmmmmklllllmlkmklmHGHHGGGGGGGGGGFCFFFFCCCCCB
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:19453:2143 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    GAGGGGCATCAGCCACCGCCAAGTCCAGAGCCATTTCCATCCTGCAGAAGAAGCCCCGCCACCAGCAGCTTCTGCCATCTCTCTCCTCCTTTTTCTTCAGCCACAGGCTCCCAGACATGACAGCCATCATCAA
    +
    [Ofd[Q]RS^RRib;eimnlnmnjnmnjYiiimmmYmnjVnmi[iomnomoldnnnmnlmimooooomoonnoojomlkjnlnnnonnlkomkjoonnonomomonnlmonmnjnmnnnnjmljmmmmiiiii
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:11660:2539 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    AGCCCCGCCACCAGCAGCTTCTGCCATCTCTCTCCTCCTTTTTCTTCAGCCACAGGCTCCCAGACATGACAGCCATCATCAAA
    +
    Qbiiijkjkijmjmnnnnnmmnnooonnnnonnnoonlooommoonnooooooonnmoonnnnmmnnnnnnmmmmmmmiifgi
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:18713:2826 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    CTGTTATTGCTAGCGTTTTAGCACAGGTGCAGCTGGTGGAGTCTGGGGGAGGATTGGTCCAGGCTGGAGGCTCTCTGAGACTCTCCTGTGCAGGCTCTTCACCCGCCTTCACTAAACTCGCCGTGGGGTGGTTCCGCCAGGCTCCAGGAAAGGAGCGTGAGTTTGTCGCAGCTTGTGGTTGGAGTGGAAGTGATACATACTATGCGGACTCCGTGAAGGGCCGATCCAGCATCTTCAGAGACAACGCCAAGAACACGGTGTATCTGCAAATGAACAGCCTGAAACCTGAGGACACGGCCATTTATTACTGTGCAGTGAGAGTATGGTGGGCGGGCGATTGGGATACAGAAACGCAGTATGATTACTGGGGCCAGGGGACCCAGGTCACCGTCTCCTCAGAATTCGGTAAGCCTATCCCTAAC
    +
    BBBBBFFFFFFFFGGEFGGGGGHHHHHGHFHHFHHHGFGGHFHHGHHGGGGGGHHHEFGFHHHHHHGHHGGHHHHHHHHHHHHEHHHGHHGFHGGHHHEHHHHGGFEFGGFFHHHGHHEGGGG@DGFG<@CGGGHGGGGFGGECEHFHEHHAGGHHGDFGGCGFGFFGHGGGGlkjflgUTUghU_lgkl`^kllkgh^lkigejlgjaejlkjlgilhdcjkilahmlllmmlmkmmmkjllkhkKgmHHGGHFGFFHGHHEGDDGFHHGHHHHHFGHHHHFGEEGFFGHFDBGHGGFFHHFHHHFHHGHFHFFHHEHFGFFHGGGEECEEEAFCF3HFGEGFHGHHECFEHFHFHFGD5HHHDFE1GGHFHHHHFFCHFFG3FFAEEFAGHFGHEDBFEGFEBGGGGGFFFFFFFAA>33
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:11972:2903 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    GGGGCTTCTTCTGCAGGATGGAAATGGCTCTGGACTTGGCGGTGGCTGATGCCCCTCGCTCTGCTGCCGCTTG
    +
    jkikkjjmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnoooooooonoooomnnnnnnnnmoononnmnnmmmmmmnmjjjjklkkkjj
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:13695:2965 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    TGGCTGCTGAGGAGAAGCAGGCCCAGTCGCTGCAACCATCCAGCAGCCGCCGCAGCAGCCATTACCCGGCTGCTGTCCAGAACCAAGCGGCAGCAGAGCGAGGGGCATCAGCCACCGCCAAGTCCAGAGCCATTTCCATCCTGCAGAAGAAGCCCCGCCACCAGCAGCTTCTGCCATCTCTCTCCTCCTTTTTCTTCAGCCACAGGCTCCCAGACATGACAGCCATCATCAAA
    +
    OZQPQPQTS8_\VV_VT`T`Sh__;TaTVV`TTh<`Ua;aWW`TTTaTS`SV8VTgVimmmka<mkfiUiU_TW`WiWWaaWhUaTTfiVVbbVUjjTgbTmmlWWlWmcWnhcnnnnnnmmkooommmoooonimmYVonmmmnioooollnnnmnmnmnnnmnnnnnmmnnnnnmmnnkmmlmmllmmmmmmoolommmmlmllllmmmllllllllllkkkkkkkhihgg
    @M02713:293:GW200329AmpliconEZC0318:1:2105:15588:3299 1:N:0:TGATCACG+AGGCGAAG
    TGGCTGCTGAGGAGAAGCAGGCCCAGTCGCTGCAACCATCCAGCAGCCGCCGCAGCAGCCATTACCCGGCTGCTGTCCAGAACCAAGCGGCAGCAGAGCGAGGGGCATCAGCCACCGCCAAGTCCAGAGCCATTTCCATCCTGCAGAAGAAGCCCCGCCACCAGTAGCTTCTGCCATCTCTCTCCTCCTTTTTCTTCAGCCACAGGCTCCCAGACATGACAGCCATCATCAAA
    +
    4ZOPP\6TT8^\`9UUU9T_ScaS;TTT`UUUTa<b;U0aTTTT<TbT_`SUUVT`VinmmiaUh`TiUTUiTjaWWajjjWbUbTTSiVnmmljiUTTbTllmWjbWUWVlgcnnlmhnnnnoonmilooooonnonmonommonooonfnnnnmnmnnnnmn`mmnnmmnnnnnmmmmnmmmnmlllmmlmmlmlmmmmmmmlllmmmmllllllllllkkkkkkkhhhhh
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    trim threshold of 59
    If this data is in Illumina encoding (Phred+64) then you need to specify "qin=64". If you need the Q scores reformatted to sanger then "qout=33".

    Comment

    • maxz411
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2020
      • 7

      #3
      I thought Phred+64 was no longer used for Illumina scores? I am pretty sure mine is encoded in Phred+33. And I specified qin=33 and qout=33 in the command.

      The reason the threshold is 59 is not because it is Phred+64, but because the scores were increased during merging.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        I see. Did you merge the data using `bbmerge`? If not can you try it instead of whichever program you used? I am not sure having Q-scores that go past even Illumina encoding make sense.

        Comment

        • maxz411
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2020
          • 7

          #5
          Ah I figured out what was happening. Your comment about the high Phred scores got me thinking on the right track. After looking at the documentation further it seems that bbmap has a flag to cap base quality which is set to 41 by default, which would eliminate almost all of my bases, explaining my results.

          I added the following flags

          maxcalledquality=1000 ibq

          to remove the cap on quality score and also 'ibq' to ignore any base scores it might consider problematic in case they are still being flagged somehow. This fixed my issue and outputted a properly trimmed file.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...