Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pparg
    Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 19

    #1

    Maq problem: 0 raw reads mapped

    Dear all,
    I tried Maq recently on some RNA-seq short read data. I kept getting none of the reads mapped.

    Here is my code:
    maq fasta2bfa chr1.fa chr1.bfa
    maq fastq2bfq Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.fastq Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.bfq
    #so far so good
    maq match Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.map chr1.bfa Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.bfq

    output for the last line:
    -- maq-0.7.1
    [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
    [ma_load_reads] set length of the first read as 32.
    [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
    [ma_longread2read] encoding reads... 48694392 sequences processed.
    [ma_match] set the minimum insert size as 33.
    [match_core] Total length of the reference: 247249719
    [match_core] round 1/3...
    [match_core] making index...
    [match_search] 0% processed in 271.061 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
    ras:SRA002355 luow$ head -n 20 nohup.out
    -- maq-0.7.1
    [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
    [ma_load_reads] set length of the first read as 32.
    [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
    [ma_longread2read] encoding reads... 48694392 sequences processed.
    [ma_match] set the minimum insert size as 33.
    [match_core] Total length of the reference: 247249719
    [match_core] round 1/3...
    [match_core] making index...
    [match_search] 0% processed in 271.061 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
    [match_search] 1% processed in 271.364 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
    ...(output truncated)
    [match_search] 99% processed in 573.003 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
    [match_search] 100% processed in 573.304 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
    [match_core] sorting the hits and dumping the results...
    [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
    [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
    [mapping_count_single] 0, 0, 0, 0
    [maq_indel_pe] the indel detector only works with short-insert mate-pair reads.
    [match_data2mapping] 0 out of 48694392 raw reads are mapped with 0 in pairs.
    -- (total, isPE, mapped, paired) = (24347196, 0, 0, 0)

    If you are interested in trying this out, the raw short read data (you may want to use only part of the data for a quick trial) and reference genome can be downloaded by typing:
    curl -O ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/golden...ps/chromFa.zip
    curl -O ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/stati...3003J.fastq.gz

    I got similar results when I used ‘maq.pl easyrun’. align reported similar results before here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=902, but no soluatoin has been posted. I used a Mac OSX 10.5 system, Maq built from the platform independent version maq-0.7.1.tar.bz2. Any suggestions/thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
    Last edited by pparg; 02-17-2009, 07:38 AM.
  • zee
    NGS specialist
    • Apr 2008
    • 249

    #2
    I dont see your BFA file in the "maq match" step, so no genome to search against

    it is :

    maq map [options] <out.map> <chr.bfa> <reads_1.bfq> [reads_2.bfq]

    Comment

    • pparg
      Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 19

      #3
      Thanks Zee,
      Good call. This turns out to be a typo in my post, sorry about that and I corrected it now.
      I actually had chr1.bfa in my maq match line originally, otherwise there would just be an error message without any output.
      Any other thoughts/suggestions?

      Comment

      • zee
        NGS specialist
        • Apr 2008
        • 249

        #4
        It does appear to be a strange error. Perhaps try a much smaller chunk of your dataset. You might want to check whether your reads match another chromosome e.g. chr22 or chrX - make a BFA file of that.
        I would also look at trying another aligner altogether e.g. Novoalign (www.novocraft.com) and Bowtie (bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net) that export MAQ's .map format.

        Comment

        • pparg
          Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 19

          #5
          I built the same maq from the platform independent version maq-0.7.1.tar.bz2 on a linux machine. And repeated the same job in my original post. It works fine this time. This makes me doubt that maq does not work for Mac machines with powerpc architecture (common for Mac systems) somehow. And this may explain why the other people got the same strange problem as me here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=902.

          Comment

          • kaixinsjtu
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 9

            #6
            Hi, where did you get the sra002355? I can not find it on sra. Did they deleted it?? need help, thanks!!

            Originally posted by pparg View Post
            Dear all,
            I tried Maq recently on some RNA-seq short read data. I kept getting none of the reads mapped.

            Here is my code:
            maq fasta2bfa chr1.fa chr1.bfa
            maq fastq2bfq Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.fastq Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.bfq
            #so far so good
            maq match Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.map chr1.bfa Control-6S.HWI-E4_8_3003J.bfq

            output for the last line:
            -- maq-0.7.1
            [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
            [ma_load_reads] set length of the first read as 32.
            [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
            [ma_longread2read] encoding reads... 48694392 sequences processed.
            [ma_match] set the minimum insert size as 33.
            [match_core] Total length of the reference: 247249719
            [match_core] round 1/3...
            [match_core] making index...
            [match_search] 0% processed in 271.061 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
            ras:SRA002355 luow$ head -n 20 nohup.out
            -- maq-0.7.1
            [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
            [ma_load_reads] set length of the first read as 32.
            [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
            [ma_longread2read] encoding reads... 48694392 sequences processed.
            [ma_match] set the minimum insert size as 33.
            [match_core] Total length of the reference: 247249719
            [match_core] round 1/3...
            [match_core] making index...
            [match_search] 0% processed in 271.061 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
            [match_search] 1% processed in 271.364 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
            ...(output truncated)
            [match_search] 99% processed in 573.003 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
            [match_search] 100% processed in 573.304 sec: 0 / 0 = 0.000
            [match_core] sorting the hits and dumping the results...
            [ma_load_reads] loading reads...
            [ma_load_reads] 24347196*2 reads loaded.
            [mapping_count_single] 0, 0, 0, 0
            [maq_indel_pe] the indel detector only works with short-insert mate-pair reads.
            [match_data2mapping] 0 out of 48694392 raw reads are mapped with 0 in pairs.
            -- (total, isPE, mapped, paired) = (24347196, 0, 0, 0)

            If you are interested in trying this out, the raw short read data (you may want to use only part of the data for a quick trial) and reference genome can be downloaded by typing:
            curl -O ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/golden...ps/chromFa.zip
            curl -O ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/stati...3003J.fastq.gz

            I got similar results when I used ‘maq.pl easyrun’. align reported similar results before here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=902, but no soluatoin has been posted. I used a Mac OSX 10.5 system, Maq built from the platform independent version maq-0.7.1.tar.bz2. Any suggestions/thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

            Comment

            • tsp
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 5

              #7
              Has anybody succeeded in solving this problem with "0 raw reads mapped"?
              I have exactly the same problem on the ia64 (Altix) machine. Using the same Typhi data with the same command line arguments as in this thread fails on the ia64 but succeeds on my i586 desktop. (using maq-0.7.1). It looks like that there is an architecture problem in the match_search function (match.cc) ...
              The first differences when comparing the different runs show up after following command:
              maq map -n 2 -e 70 -u [email protected] [email protected] ref.bfa [email protected]
              Last edited by tsp; 06-19-2009, 04:23 AM.

              Comment

              • rlan
                Junior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 1

                #8
                MAQ does not work correctly on Ia64 linux

                MAQ code seems architecture dependent. I have the same problem. zero mapped reads on a Ia64 linux machine. I tried it on a x86 linux machine. it worked fine. It might have something to do with 64 bit compiling. I can't use m64 or mlp64 option even though it's a 64 bit machine.

                There is another strange problem. I only have 3 reads in the test file. However MAQ map tells me 3*2 reads
                [ma_load_reads] 3*2 reads loaded.
                [mapping_count_single] 4, 4, 4, 4
                [maq_indel_pe] the indel detector only works with short-insert mate-pair reads.
                [match_data2mapping] 3 out of 6 raw reads are mapped with 0 in pairs.

                Has any one encounted the same problem? I checked the map file etc. It seems nothing wrong apart from above incorrect reporting.

                Comment

                • Jonathan
                  Member
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 36

                  #9
                  Yes, maq does that 2*(#reads) for single-ended reads -
                  don't know why - maybe it is hardcoded in the message-print?
                  Haven't bothered to look yet;

                  Best
                  -Jonathan

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                    by SEQadmin2



                    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                    ...
                    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                    ...
                    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
                  0 responses
                  27 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
                  0 responses
                  22 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
                  0 responses
                  37 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
                  0 responses
                  51 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...