Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bruce01
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 160

    5' promoter/alignment question

    I am looking at TFBS analysis for a colleague. He is interested in TRANSFAC but it being commercial I am interested in JASPAR. From Wasserman and Sandelin 2004 paper (doi:10.1038/nrg1315) they state "recurrent alignment of the 5' edges of ESTs and/or full-length cDNAs can be indicative of promoter locations".

    While this may seem obvious, it was written 'pre-NGS' and as such I am wondering what the current consensus is on this? It is hard to search the literature for these sorts of issues and no good reviews have jumped out. To be more specific I was thinking about work stemming from this: is it worth a capture-seq experiment on differentially expressed genes to look for promoters, TFBS or other regulatory sequence from the 5' 'edge', or can you use the rather ad hoc assertion made above?

    Thoughts appreciated.
  • bb420
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 14

    #2
    Hi Bruce

    I work for Biobase-International as a Field Application Scientist.

    Despite (or because) being a commercial product, TRANSFAC has various
    advantages over other products: its matrix library is much more comprehensive and more frequently updated , and is connected with a lot of detailed information, e.g. on the single binding sites on which the matrices are based. In addition, it contains a large number of processed high-throughput data, and various tools. Transfac has a very intuitive and a user friendly web interface. Also, our support team is always there to answer any questions.

    I would also like to bring to your notice the recent Encode publication in Nature one of the papers compared Transfac and Jaspar and according to their results Transfac was more informative. You can have a look at the contribution of Transfac towards the Encode project here.
    You can find more information on Transfac here.

    Please feel free to reach me in case you need any further information.

    Bhanu Bhargava
    [email protected]

    Comment

    • ajthomas
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 167

      #3
      While the assertion is a good indication of promoter locations, it is certainly not conclusive. The only way to be sure is to map the transcription initiation site experimentally, and that's not always easy to do and can't be done in any sort of high-throughput fashion.

      Another option to look at is the ECR Browser, assuming your species is one of the few whose genomes are available in that tool. It looks for conserved regions in genomes and can search for conserved and aligned TFBS. While still not conclusive proof that any given region is a functional promoter, evolutionary conservation of a region certainly adds more weight to the notion that it is.

      Comment

      • bruce01
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 160

        #4
        @AJThomas: Excellent, I had not previously encountered ECR browser and am fortunate that cow is a fairly well-studied beast. Many thanks for the suggestion.

        @Bhanu: our licence for Transfac is pending!

        Comment

        • ajthomas
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 167

          #5
          Glad I could help. I also study the cow and the annotations in ECR Browser are pretty good for the cow. In case you didn't find it yet, the cow isn't one of the default species shown. Just click the blue "+" on the right side to add it.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          49 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          108 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          125 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...