Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    weird fastqc error

    Here is how I run it: fastqc file.fastq -o output

    Results:
    ....
    Approx 95% complete for 1.fastq
    Approx 100% complete for 1.fastq
    Analysis complete for 1.fastq
    Failed to process file 1.fastq

    Why it says "failed" while the analysis is also marked as complete? so confused ... can someone help?
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    #2
    Since this is a pair-ended seq, I run the fastqc on both fastqs at the same time, still errors ...

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?

      Comment

      • frankyue50
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 34

        #4
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?
        Thanks for the response. I did get a *fastq.zip file, but when I failed to unzip it, it gave me this error msg:
        End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
        a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
        latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
        the last disk(s) of this archive.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?

          Comment

          • frankyue50
            Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 34

            #6
            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?
            I am thinking the same thing. I run my fastqc on a linux server ... maybe I should fire up GUI and directly run it on my iMAC

            Comment

            • mastal
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 666

              #7
              I have had similar problems recently, when I have been analysing Illumina 150 or 250 bp PE samples, and using the --nogroup option.

              FastQC seemed to have completed the analysis, but then the output file didn't get printed.

              I can't remember whether I also got a Java out of memory error message.

              I solved my problem by modifying the fastqc perl script that is used
              to run fastqc from the commandline, and increasing the amount of memory.
              The default is Xmx250m.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...