Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    weird fastqc error

    Here is how I run it: fastqc file.fastq -o output

    Results:
    ....
    Approx 95% complete for 1.fastq
    Approx 100% complete for 1.fastq
    Analysis complete for 1.fastq
    Failed to process file 1.fastq

    Why it says "failed" while the analysis is also marked as complete? so confused ... can someone help?
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    #2
    Since this is a pair-ended seq, I run the fastqc on both fastqs at the same time, still errors ...

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?

      Comment

      • frankyue50
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 34

        #4
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?
        Thanks for the response. I did get a *fastq.zip file, but when I failed to unzip it, it gave me this error msg:
        End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
        a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
        latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
        the last disk(s) of this archive.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?

          Comment

          • frankyue50
            Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 34

            #6
            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?
            I am thinking the same thing. I run my fastqc on a linux server ... maybe I should fire up GUI and directly run it on my iMAC

            Comment

            • mastal
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 666

              #7
              I have had similar problems recently, when I have been analysing Illumina 150 or 250 bp PE samples, and using the --nogroup option.

              FastQC seemed to have completed the analysis, but then the output file didn't get printed.

              I can't remember whether I also got a Java out of memory error message.

              I solved my problem by modifying the fastqc perl script that is used
              to run fastqc from the commandline, and increasing the amount of memory.
              The default is Xmx250m.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              37 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              34 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...