Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    #1

    weird fastqc error

    Here is how I run it: fastqc file.fastq -o output

    Results:
    ....
    Approx 95% complete for 1.fastq
    Approx 100% complete for 1.fastq
    Analysis complete for 1.fastq
    Failed to process file 1.fastq

    Why it says "failed" while the analysis is also marked as complete? so confused ... can someone help?
  • frankyue50
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 34

    #2
    Since this is a pair-ended seq, I run the fastqc on both fastqs at the same time, still errors ...

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?

      Comment

      • frankyue50
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 34

        #4
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        Are you getting any results in "output" irrespective of the "failed' message?
        Thanks for the response. I did get a *fastq.zip file, but when I failed to unzip it, it gave me this error msg:
        End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
        a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
        latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
        the last disk(s) of this archive.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?

          Comment

          • frankyue50
            Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 34

            #6
            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Are you able to run the GUI for FastQC to test (just run fastqc without any other options)? Are you running this on a server or a local machine (what OS)?
            I am thinking the same thing. I run my fastqc on a linux server ... maybe I should fire up GUI and directly run it on my iMAC

            Comment

            • mastal
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 666

              #7
              I have had similar problems recently, when I have been analysing Illumina 150 or 250 bp PE samples, and using the --nogroup option.

              FastQC seemed to have completed the analysis, but then the output file didn't get printed.

              I can't remember whether I also got a Java out of memory error message.

              I solved my problem by modifying the fastqc perl script that is used
              to run fastqc from the commandline, and increasing the amount of memory.
              The default is Xmx250m.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                Yesterday, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...