Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Glongo
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 3

    #1

    RNA-seq: Expression levels and polymorphisms

    Hello from beautiful Santa Cruz, CA!

    I am interested in identifying variable expression levels as well as sequence polymorphism between conspecifics in different environments all in one fell swoop and it seems that RNA-seq is the right tool for this mission. However it seems that detecting variable expression levels requires ample coverage for sensitivity purposes while detecting polymorphisms (i.e. SNPs) doesn't require as much depth. Is it safe to assume that if you obtain sufficient coverage to detect variable expression that you will have the power to detect polymophisms? Are there any models for estimating sufficient sequencing depth to achieve the desired power to detect expression differences? I am working with teleost fishes with ~1Gb genome.

    Any insight into the pros and cons of RNA-seq library preps (price and efficacy) would also be greatly appreciated!

    Cheers,
    Gary
  • jparsons
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 62

    #2
    RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

    I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

    The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.

    Comment

    • Glongo
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by jparsons View Post
      RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

      I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

      The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.
      Hi jparsons,

      Thanks for the reply! I should have been more specific, I am not looking for SNPs that correlate to changes in expression but want to be able to detect both variable expression levels and SNPs between individuals from different populations. For instance in a MHC complex gene I'd like to be able to identify SNPs or other polymorphisms between individuals and, at the same time, be able to identity different expression levels of say some metabolic gene.

      Cheers,
      Gary

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...