Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Glongo
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 3

    RNA-seq: Expression levels and polymorphisms

    Hello from beautiful Santa Cruz, CA!

    I am interested in identifying variable expression levels as well as sequence polymorphism between conspecifics in different environments all in one fell swoop and it seems that RNA-seq is the right tool for this mission. However it seems that detecting variable expression levels requires ample coverage for sensitivity purposes while detecting polymorphisms (i.e. SNPs) doesn't require as much depth. Is it safe to assume that if you obtain sufficient coverage to detect variable expression that you will have the power to detect polymophisms? Are there any models for estimating sufficient sequencing depth to achieve the desired power to detect expression differences? I am working with teleost fishes with ~1Gb genome.

    Any insight into the pros and cons of RNA-seq library preps (price and efficacy) would also be greatly appreciated!

    Cheers,
    Gary
  • jparsons
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 62

    #2
    RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

    I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

    The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.

    Comment

    • Glongo
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by jparsons View Post
      RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

      I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

      The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.
      Hi jparsons,

      Thanks for the reply! I should have been more specific, I am not looking for SNPs that correlate to changes in expression but want to be able to detect both variable expression levels and SNPs between individuals from different populations. For instance in a MHC complex gene I'd like to be able to identify SNPs or other polymorphisms between individuals and, at the same time, be able to identity different expression levels of say some metabolic gene.

      Cheers,
      Gary

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      49 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...