Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Glongo
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 3

    RNA-seq: Expression levels and polymorphisms

    Hello from beautiful Santa Cruz, CA!

    I am interested in identifying variable expression levels as well as sequence polymorphism between conspecifics in different environments all in one fell swoop and it seems that RNA-seq is the right tool for this mission. However it seems that detecting variable expression levels requires ample coverage for sensitivity purposes while detecting polymorphisms (i.e. SNPs) doesn't require as much depth. Is it safe to assume that if you obtain sufficient coverage to detect variable expression that you will have the power to detect polymophisms? Are there any models for estimating sufficient sequencing depth to achieve the desired power to detect expression differences? I am working with teleost fishes with ~1Gb genome.

    Any insight into the pros and cons of RNA-seq library preps (price and efficacy) would also be greatly appreciated!

    Cheers,
    Gary
  • jparsons
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 62

    #2
    RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

    I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

    The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.

    Comment

    • Glongo
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by jparsons View Post
      RNA-seq will miss any noncoding polymorphisms (introns/promoter/etc). You will be also be discarding potential SNPs in lowly-expressed transcripts where your coverage is too low to detect DE. Depending on your exact use case (are you interested in sequence variants which may affect distal sites?) you may be better served by doing both genome sequencing and RNA-seq.

      I'm actually having trouble thinking of a situation where you would not want both: polymorphisms within transcripts seem highly unlikely to have anything to do with the expression level of said transcript, unless they affect splice sites.

      The other questions are a bit outside my wheelhouse.
      Hi jparsons,

      Thanks for the reply! I should have been more specific, I am not looking for SNPs that correlate to changes in expression but want to be able to detect both variable expression levels and SNPs between individuals from different populations. For instance in a MHC complex gene I'd like to be able to identify SNPs or other polymorphisms between individuals and, at the same time, be able to identity different expression levels of say some metabolic gene.

      Cheers,
      Gary

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
        by SEQadmin2


        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


        Introduction

        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Environmental Genomics in the Age of NGS: From Microbes to Conservation Strategies
        by SEQadmin2

        Studying ecosystems means dealing with complex, multi-species communities that are hard to observe at scale. This complexity, however, hides many important questions to be answered, from how biogeochemical cycles work and how climate change can affect species distribution to how conservation strategies can work best.


        Genomics, particularly since the expansion of NGS, has transformed ecosystem ecology. By sequencing environmental DNA, we can now assess biodiversity without direct...
        05-06-2026, 09:04 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 05-28-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...