Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dena.dinesh
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 58

    #1

    BLASTing masssive protein sequences

    Hi,

    I have a transcriptome which consists of 38,000 protein sequences. Is it possible to BLAST all of them and find othologs and of these proteins and GeneOnology and pathways involved if there is any for these proteins.

    Kindly guide me

    Regards
    Dena
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    It is certainly possible to do the BLASTing.

    Question is do you have access to a cluster/adequate hardware and patience, since this will likely take a while to complete. Based on the number of proteins I assume this is a eukaryotic (non-model?) organism. If there is a closely related genome/proteome available then you could significantly narrow your search space and speed up BLAST part.

    Comment

    • dena.dinesh
      Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 58

      #3
      Hi GenoMax,

      Thank you very much for your reply. Yes the organism in which I am working is a eukaryotic non-model organism. I know an organism called "Schistosoma mansoni" is a closely related organism which has genome in NCBI.

      I have desktop system which has 256 GB RAM and 16 cores. How long will it take to BLAST the 68000 nucleotides sequence against database and filter out top3-5 homologs and their corresponding Gene Ontology or pathways?
      Kindly guide me

      Comment

      • Zapages
        Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 98

        #4
        I would check this answer and try the Diamond BLASTx option as that will be the quickest route with similar results as NCBI BLAST/BLAST+.

        Link to something similar: http://ask.iplantcollaborative.org/q...gg-annotation/

        All the best.

        Comment

        • westerman
          Rick Westerman
          • Jun 2008
          • 1104

          #5
          While Diamond is much faster than BlastX the results are different in that correspondence between the top hit from each program is likely to not be the same. I *think* that this is due to differences in determining the evalues. Digging deeper and taking, say, the top 10 hits will start showing similarities between the programs. This is not to say that Diamond's results are biologically incorrect but you do have to be aware that the programs are not drop-in replacements for each other.

          Comment

          • FastAnnot
            Junior Member
            • Dec 2014
            • 4

            #6
            It's a pretty big job you're talking about because blastx is exceedingly slow and the data for annotating GOs is also rather cumbersome. For this reason we launched a cloud service fastannot.com which does this task quickly and cheaply. As the previous reply mentioned regarding Diamond, our aligner is also not identical to blastx, but the annotation results are comparable.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...