Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dynamac
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 46

    #1

    Inordinate Number of Reads Being Filtered

    I am losing about half of my data from the TrimBack Valley and Signal Intensity Filters (numTrimmedTooShortQuality). Has anyone had this problem, and if so, what are your solutions and/or recommendations?
    Any comments at all would be appreciated, as I am still a newbie with this system, and support from Roche has been spotty at best.

    Thanks!

    Barry
  • vamosia
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 15

    #2
    Which pipeline are you using? The ends of the reads may be of lower quality, which may caused reads to be filtered out.

    If your still interested in the those rejected reads anyway, you could try the standard shotgun pipeline (which supposedly is less stringent compare to the amplicon pipeline)

    Comment

    • Dynamac
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 46

      #3
      Yes, we tried the shotgun pipeline and that roughly doubled our number of bases called.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • vamosia
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 15

        #4
        Great, keep in mind that the amplicon pipeline does several additional correction to help reduce homopolymer error (amplicon library are generally very bright, hence more chance of producing homopolymer error).

        While the using the shotgun pipeline to process amplicon samples gives more data, it may or may contain more homopolyer error. Just something to watch for.

        Comment

        • ajthomas
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 167

          #5
          In my experience, the extra data you get by processing amplicon data with the shotgun pipeline doesn't help. The extra data doesn't ususally equate to more information because the lower quality of the data offsets the reduced quantity. As for homopolymers, I do find more errors in homopolymer regions. Of course, your experience may differ from mine. It's probably worth it to try it both ways and see if that extra data helps or not.

          There are a few TCBs relating to amplicon sequencing that you should read if you haven't already. There's one (sorry, I don't remember which one off the top of my head) that talks about the what makes the amplicon filtering pipeline different. You should certainly read that if you haven't already.

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            But the amplicon pipeline does not do quality trim-back. It tosses reads that don't meet its quality criteria, but the reads it keeps may still have low quality 3' sequence in them.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • RCJK
              Senior Member
              • May 2009
              • 156

              #7
              One of the recommended filtering strategies is to use the amplicon pipeline, but change the setting so that it will trim the reads instead of discarding them. This is in the latest (July 2011) guide to amplicon experimental design.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Yesterday, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              71 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...