Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GraemeFox
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 14

    #1

    Rapid Library Library Quantitation using concentration not RFU

    Hi,
    I am attempting the Library Quantitation phase of the Rapid Library Prep. set up
    ie. Producing a standard curve of fluorescence through 8 serial dilutions of RL
    Standard.

    However the fluorometer I am using (Invitrogen Qubit 2.0) does not seem to give the option of giving results in RFU.

    So....I am able to measure the concentration of my sample in ng/uL.

    BUT....the 'Rapid Library Calculator' only accepts measurements in RFU.

    AND...I need to ultimately calculate the concentration of my library in molecules/uL.

    Is there a way to work around this that anybody knows of?
  • n2onme
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 6

    #2
    Try the link below. It is used to convert ng/uL to molecules/uL with fragment size correction. You could always get a Kapa Biosystems qPCR Kit to quantitate your libraries.

    Comment

    • TonyBrooks
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 303

      #3
      Doesn't the Qubit use Picogreen chemistry for fluorescence?
      Therefore, fluorescence should be proportional to mass of DNA within the range of the Qubit standard curve.

      I never trust the fluorescence readings for quantification as you assume all library fragments have adapters ligated at both ends. I always use the Kapa qPCR for my rapid libraries

      Comment

      • GraemeFox
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 14

        #4
        Thanks for the suggestions.

        Having 'explored' the fluorometer a little more thoroughly I found that it does indeed give me RFU values.

        This despite a phone call to Invitrogen who said that it wasn't possible on this unit!

        Thanks for your help.

        Comment

        • madseq
          Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 13

          #5
          Hi,

          GraemeFox, I´ve heard that the Qubit fluorometer is not able to measure RL FAM (I don´t know if this is because of wavelength or sensitivity) . Do you obtain reasonable numbers when you measure serial dilutions of the standard?

          Comment

          • GraemeFox
            Member
            • Oct 2011
            • 14

            #6
            Madseq - when performing the serial dilutions I used picogreen so I didn't have any problem.

            However, my library itself was quantified using the FAM incorporated into the rapid library primers and worked fine on the Qubit.

            Comment

            • madseq
              Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 13

              #7
              Hi GraemeFox,

              When you finally measured your library FAM fluorescence, did you quantify serial dilutions of the RL standard? Roche states that the Qubit is not valid for RL FAM quantification, I´ve just asked to a Roche application specialist and he says that the problem is about sensitivity.

              Comment

              • RCJK
                Senior Member
                • May 2009
                • 156

                #8
                Hi GraemeFox,

                I was wondering how are you able to obtain the RFU values from the Qubit? Thanks!

                Comment

                • GraemeFox
                  Member
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 14

                  #9
                  Originally posted by RCJK View Post
                  Hi GraemeFox,

                  I was wondering how are you able to obtain the RFU values from the Qubit? Thanks!
                  Hi, On the 'Data' page on the unit itself you can scroll across to the right using a fairly inconspicuous scroll bar just below the rows of data.

                  Alternatively if you export your data via the USB port and open it up in Excel, the RFU values are also given.

                  Hope that helps!

                  Comment

                  • GraemeFox
                    Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 14

                    #10
                    Originally posted by madseq View Post
                    Hi GraemeFox,

                    When you finally measured your library FAM fluorescence, did you quantify serial dilutions of the RL standard? Roche states that the Qubit is not valid for RL FAM quantification, I´ve just asked to a Roche application specialist and he says that the problem is about sensitivity.

                    I didn't have a problem quantifying the FAM fluorescence of my library, or at least I didn't seem to.
                    Will certainly be looking into the sensitivity problem you mention though.

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                      by SEQadmin2



                      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                      ...
                      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                      by SEQadmin2


                      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                      ...
                      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                      ...
                      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                    0 responses
                    17 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                    0 responses
                    15 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                    0 responses
                    13 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
                    0 responses
                    24 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...