Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • macoma
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 1

    #1

    mira parameters for SNP search in transcriptome de novo

    Hi
    I have 3 populations that are tagged. Ten individuals (non tagged) within each populations.
    We used 454 titanium technology, with non normalized cDNA bank
    The aim of our study is to select SNP in order to make a genome scan (Fst scan) to found selection.
    I choose Mira for the assembly, but I'm not sure to use it properly.For the moment I made assemblies with default parametres of miraESTSNPs -job=denovo,est,454. I just test modifying -AL: mrs (default = 80, test = 70 and 90), -AL:ms (default=15, test 10 and 20).
    For information the average expected identity between 2 alleles is something like 95%.
    I need a good coverage because to validate a SNP it has to be present at least 10 times (20 times would be better).
    There are a lot of parameters we can modify but I'm not sur to really know on what parameters I have to focus on for my study.
    Somebody could give me some advice ?

    For information :
    few stats : default parameters + ms=10
    Num. reads assembled : 360376
    Num. singlets : 4008
    Num. contig >=500 bases : 5945
    Total consensus: 5677061
    MAx coverage : 842
    avg. coverage = 11,53
    few stats : default parameters
    Num. reads assembled : 360240
    Num. singlets : 4008
    Num. contigd >=500 bases : 9119
    Total consensus: 8368209
    MAx coverage : 840
    avg. coverage = 8,73
    few stats : default parameters + ms=20
    Num. reads assembled : 360103
    Num. singlets : 3936
    Num. contig >=500 bases : 6001
    Total consensus: 5724129
    MAx coverage : 795
    avg. coverage = 11,87
    few stats : default parameters + mrs=90
    Num. reads assembled : 308455
    Num. singlets : 4039
    Num. contig >=500 bases :0
    Total consensus: 0
    MAx coverage : 0
    avg. coverage = 0
    few stats : default parameters + mrs=70
    Num. reads assembled : 383220
    Num. singlets :7495
    Num. contig >=500 bases :16355
    Total consensus: 14075898
    MAx coverage : 851
    avg. coverage = 6,27

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...