Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dasenkom
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 1

    emPCR question

    Hi, I'm new to 454 sequencing and in the process of setting up our lab to perform GS Junior runs. Our FAS recommended that we have a PCR hood for setting up the emPCR. Is this necessary? Do most labs have PCR hoods for this step? Do the benefits of having the PCR hood for emPCR setup outweigh the costs of purchasing one?
    Thanks,
    Mark
  • mohdsos
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 16

    #2
    I use a normal hood no air flow only light. and it's fine .

    Comment

    • Jacky76
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 4

      #3
      You will take some advantage for preventing any possible contaminations by using PCR enclosure. Roche people recommend us to divide the spaces for pre-PCR from post-PCR to prevent cross contanmination. But it will be less necessary to have two rooms if you have PCR enclosure because it can replace pre-PCR. There are two major steps that contamination causative which are Nebulization and emulsion breaking. DNA molecules can fly during this jobs, so it also is recommended that you to have two ventilation hood systems for the both steps.

      Comment

      • ajthomas
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 167

        #4
        It is rather important to not mix the space or equipment used for the pre- and post-emPCR steps. The strands you remove during the emPCR breaking/recovery/enrichment process are excellent templates for emPCR, and there are a lot of those molecules compared to what you start with. Getting even a little on a pipette or something and then using that same equipment/lab space for setting up the emPCR is just asking for contamination. Yes, you need a hood or a separate room and a dedicated set of pipettes and other equipment for setting up your emPCR.

        Comment


        • #5
          It may not seem like a big deal at first, but you will better off starting in a hood.

          Comment

          • anujgupta
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7

            #6
            All depend upon your hands-on expertise. Emulsion breaking specially in LV results in aerosol formation that's why this area is termed as dirty. It should be separated from that used for emulsion preparation. I agree with SeqAA, better starting with a hood.

            Comment

            • MBS
              Junior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2

              #7
              Better use a hood

              You'll find out soon, that a hood is good, when you sequence different organisms, because you will find the alien sequences in the following run. This can be quite embarrassing if the data will go out to some other group.

              You probably never find out, if you only work on one or closely related organisms, because the alien reads are hard to find. They may just spoil your results.

              Use UV light and bleach in it! Same is for the library preps!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...