Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dasenkom
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 1

    #1

    emPCR question

    Hi, I'm new to 454 sequencing and in the process of setting up our lab to perform GS Junior runs. Our FAS recommended that we have a PCR hood for setting up the emPCR. Is this necessary? Do most labs have PCR hoods for this step? Do the benefits of having the PCR hood for emPCR setup outweigh the costs of purchasing one?
    Thanks,
    Mark
  • mohdsos
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 16

    #2
    I use a normal hood no air flow only light. and it's fine .

    Comment

    • Jacky76
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 4

      #3
      You will take some advantage for preventing any possible contaminations by using PCR enclosure. Roche people recommend us to divide the spaces for pre-PCR from post-PCR to prevent cross contanmination. But it will be less necessary to have two rooms if you have PCR enclosure because it can replace pre-PCR. There are two major steps that contamination causative which are Nebulization and emulsion breaking. DNA molecules can fly during this jobs, so it also is recommended that you to have two ventilation hood systems for the both steps.

      Comment

      • ajthomas
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 167

        #4
        It is rather important to not mix the space or equipment used for the pre- and post-emPCR steps. The strands you remove during the emPCR breaking/recovery/enrichment process are excellent templates for emPCR, and there are a lot of those molecules compared to what you start with. Getting even a little on a pipette or something and then using that same equipment/lab space for setting up the emPCR is just asking for contamination. Yes, you need a hood or a separate room and a dedicated set of pipettes and other equipment for setting up your emPCR.

        Comment

        • SeqAA

          #5
          It may not seem like a big deal at first, but you will better off starting in a hood.

          Comment

          • anujgupta
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7

            #6
            All depend upon your hands-on expertise. Emulsion breaking specially in LV results in aerosol formation that's why this area is termed as dirty. It should be separated from that used for emulsion preparation. I agree with SeqAA, better starting with a hood.

            Comment

            • MBS
              Junior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2

              #7
              Better use a hood

              You'll find out soon, that a hood is good, when you sequence different organisms, because you will find the alien sequences in the following run. This can be quite embarrassing if the data will go out to some other group.

              You probably never find out, if you only work on one or closely related organisms, because the alien reads are hard to find. They may just spoil your results.

              Use UV light and bleach in it! Same is for the library preps!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...