Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bioinfosm
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 483

    #1

    high first base error rate

    Hi,

    I have noticed this with all of the recent RNA seq runs we have had with the solexa. The first base error rate is very high (looking at error graphs). Attached is the image for one of the tiles..

    do people face the same issue? Any remedies, apart from skipping the first read for eland alignments I suppose!

    I think we see this with other solexa runs as well, not just rna-seq..

    thanks
    Attached Files
    Last edited by bioinfosm; 07-30-2009, 10:40 AM. Reason: attach file
    --
    bioinfosm
  • BaCh
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 81

    #2
    Originally posted by bioinfosm View Post
    do people face the same issue?
    I think we see this with other solexa runs as well, not just rna-seq..
    I've just checked a couple of genome sequencing runs from 2008 (36mers) and 2009 (72mers). I have to clip bases on the left of ~4.5% to 6% of the reads (can't tell you how much, the statistics is not that detailed in the log file), the rest has no errors in the first ~20 bases.

    Originally posted by bioinfosm View Post
    Any remedies, apart from skipping the first read for eland alignments I suppose!
    Just clip away what's really wrong. I (well, MIRA) make an all vs. all comparison of the reads and clip away read ends that are seen only once or which are not confirmed by sequence from a reverse read. Takes just a couple of minutes for one lane.

    On the other hand ... with enough data, always throwing away the very first base probably does not hurt.

    Regards,
    B.

    Comment

    • NSTbioinformatics
      Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 24

      #3
      The first base is artifact "T" from the illumina protocal. The updated protocal does not have the problem.

      You should use "USE_BASES nY*" in the Gerald configure file to ingore it.

      Comment

      • bioinfosm
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 483

        #4
        Originally posted by NSTbioinformatics View Post
        The first base is artifact "T" from the illumina protocal. The updated protocal does not have the problem.

        You should use "USE_BASES nY*" in the Gerald configure file to ingore it.
        Could you elaborate on what is artifact "T", and which updated protocol you refer to that overcomes this issue?

        Thanks
        --
        bioinfosm

        Comment

        • NSTbioinformatics
          Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 24

          #5
          In our illumina runs, the first base "T" occured only on phix lane, not in other lanes (our owe sequeneces). As i heard from our technician, the first base is artifact "T" from the illumina protocal.Sorry i don't know much detail about it. Now we do not have the first base T in the phix lane. Both the illumina protocal and the phix reference are updated.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          39 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...