I am calling out all who think they have good MiSeq runs. Gaze at the perfection of this run and weep at the inadequacy of your wretched instruments:
But seriously...
Accidently clustered at a higher density than normal. But the results were still good. Raw cluster density was 1154 Kclusters/mm^2. 8.8 billion bases total. 6.8 billion bases >Q30.
Kind of interesting, this indicates that 0.6x0.4 = 24% of read pairs have zero sequencing errors in them!
And, just to add historical perspective, this is around the amount of data generated by 13 GS-FLX runs. (And we would bill out a GS-FLX run at 5x the cost of a MiSeq run.) Also, at 80 kb per 3730XL run, we would need 13,000 of them to equal the output of this single MiSeq run. That is 3 years of non-stop runs on a 3730XL!
--
Phillip
But seriously...
Accidently clustered at a higher density than normal. But the results were still good. Raw cluster density was 1154 Kclusters/mm^2. 8.8 billion bases total. 6.8 billion bases >Q30.
Kind of interesting, this indicates that 0.6x0.4 = 24% of read pairs have zero sequencing errors in them!
And, just to add historical perspective, this is around the amount of data generated by 13 GS-FLX runs. (And we would bill out a GS-FLX run at 5x the cost of a MiSeq run.) Also, at 80 kb per 3730XL run, we would need 13,000 of them to equal the output of this single MiSeq run. That is 3 years of non-stop runs on a 3730XL!
--
Phillip
Comment