Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WhiteSeal
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 14

    TruSeq Nano DNA sample prep

    Hi Everyone,

    I have done a number of TruSeq DNA preps, but now that it will be discontinued we have been looking into the TruSeq Nano prep. I have been reading the guide, but I found in the 'romoval of large DNA fragments' step things are confusing.

    I see that 125ul needs to be transferred into a new plate (twice, thus that each plate will contain 250 ul)... ? So is this 1 plate with 250ul or two plates with each 125ul?

    This continues with the removal of small fragments where 138ul and 276ul are also used as if it is the same? Really confusing and I don't see how this passed Illumina's check before it went out.

    Did anyone come across this as well and how did you continue the prep?

    With regards,

    Dirk van essen
  • SS00
    PhD Student
    • Jun 2012
    • 33

    #2
    Hi Dirk,

    I have come across this, but didn't find it confusing. I think the reason Illumina asks you to remove the supernatant in two steps is because a 1ml pipette is too big/clumsy to handle without touching the beads. Let me see if I can explain it how I understood it:

    To Remove Large Fragments You:
    Add 160ul diluted bead mixture to 100ul End Repair Product. Your total volume is 260ul.
    The beads contain the large fragments and the supernantant smaller.

    To Isolate the Supernatant for the 2nd Sided Size Selection (Remove Small Fragments) You need to remove 250ul of supernatant into a new plate (Leaving 10ul behind to avoid disturbing the beads and taking along large fragments you don't want).
    However, instead of Illumina advising you to do this at once with a large 1000ul pipette tip and risk you disturbing the beads or not being accurate with the volume they ask you to do this with a smaller 200ul pippette. Because of the volume limitation of a 200ul pipette they ask you to do this twice.
    So x 125ul goes into the SAME well in the sample plate twice to total 250ul of supernatant.

    Same goes for the remove of small fragments after adding 30ul beads to the 250ul supernantant you just isolated - total 280ul. Small fragments are in supernatant, target fragments on beads. In this step you need to remove most of the supernatant and then proceed to the EtOH wash steps. Instead of asking you to remove most of the supernant at once (with a 1000ul pipette tip) Illumina splits the volume in two - so you remove 138 twice, removing a total of 276ul supernant and leaving behind a negligeable 4ul to avoid disturbing the beads.

    Does that make any more sense?

    Comment

    • WhiteSeal
      Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 14

      #3
      Ah, that does make sense. I was confused by the 'Each CEP plate' line in the protocol, suggesting that there are two plates.

      Maybe they should just have changed the line to 'Use a 200 μl single channel to transfer, do not discard, the supernatant of 250ul'.

      Thanks for clearing that up for me.

      Dirk

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
        by SEQadmin2


        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


        Introduction

        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Environmental Genomics in the Age of NGS: From Microbes to Conservation Strategies
        by SEQadmin2

        Studying ecosystems means dealing with complex, multi-species communities that are hard to observe at scale. This complexity, however, hides many important questions to be answered, from how biogeochemical cycles work and how climate change can affect species distribution to how conservation strategies can work best.


        Genomics, particularly since the expansion of NGS, has transformed ecosystem ecology. By sequencing environmental DNA, we can now assess biodiversity without direct...
        05-06-2026, 09:04 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 05-28-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 05-26-2026, 10:12 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...