Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • urchin
    Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 20

    #1

    Need advice on PCR Workstation - laminar flow or not?

    We are starting up a project and plan to use MiSeq for analysis later. I am purchasing some new equipment and can't find any specifics on why it might be better to get a PCR workstation with laminar flow rather than dead air!! We have a regular fume hood in the lab already. I just want to decrease possible contamination for PCR prep and planned to get a UV PCR workstation, not realizing this was a possible issue. In the past I have only done projects with low risk of contamination, but now will be using universal primers.

    Please help me with pros and cons of each type if you have done these type of projects before.
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    For typical library preps, laminar flow is not necessary. A decontaminated, dedicated work bench and instrument, with clean reagents/consumables and good technique (most important!), is sufficient.

    For single-cell/extremely-low-input samples, follow the recommended guidelines for your chosen method of library prep.

    Comment

    • bunce
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 55

      #3
      Hi Urchin, In my experience of 'minimising' contamination/artefacts the workflow (as opposed to the equipment) is the thing to get right - The best advice I could give you here is to:
      1) Separate out pre-and post PCR
      2) Be careful about input DNA copy-number you seed the reaction with
      3) Be careful about the index tag combinations you use (or re-use)
      We published a paper recently on amplicon sequencing workflow - might be of use;
      Amplicon sequencing has been the method of choice in many high-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) applications. To date there has been a heavy focus on the means by which to analyse the burgeoning amount of data afforded by HTS. In contrast, there has been a distinct lack of attention paid to considerations surrounding the importance of sample preparation and the fidelity of library generation. No amount of high-end bioinformatics can compensate for poorly prepared samples and it is therefore imperative that careful attention is given to sample preparation and library generation within workflows, especially those involving multiple PCR steps. This paper redresses this imbalance by focusing on aspects pertaining to the benchtop within typical amplicon workflows: sample screening, the target region, and library generation. Empirical data is provided to illustrate the scope of the problem. Lastly, the impact of various data analysis parameters is also investigated in the context of how the data was initially generated. It is hoped this paper may serve to highlight the importance of pre-analysis workflows in achieving meaningful, future-proof data that can be analysed appropriately. As amplicon sequencing gains traction in a variety of diagnostic applications from forensics to environmental DNA (eDNA) it is paramount workflows and analytics are both fit for purpose.


      good luck with your research.

      Comment

      • urchin
        Member
        • Sep 2015
        • 20

        #4
        Thanks, I'll get the paper ASAP. We really do want to reduce our possible problems from the outset. I already know things will go wrong, it's inevitable, but still...

        Comment

        • bunce
          Member
          • Sep 2012
          • 55

          #5
          Hi Urchin - drop me an email if you want to discuss any of this. Contamination in NGS workflows (especially involving amplicons) is, as you point out, something you want to get right from the outset. The work we have done on ancient DNA, forensic and biosecurity means that we have given this topic much thought! Cheers.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2




            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
            Yesterday, 06:46 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          71 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...