Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mhmtgenc
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 7

    #1

    Low Exome Coverage with Truseq DNA Exome and NextSeq 500 workflow?

    Dear All,

    I studied a whole exome with Truseq DNA Exome (2x75 and suitable High output kit) on NextSeq 500.. AFter sequencing I got around 46 million reads per sample and 42 million of these were mapped as globally.

    As you guess I did BamQC report and got that only 11 Milllion of these 46 million reads are mapped to the targets of TruSeq DNA Exome kit. And I have used the bed file provided by Illumina for this kit.

    So what could be the possible problem that On global Nearly 90% of my reads are mapped but in target only around 23% of the reads are mapped?

    Thanks in advance
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    It indicates that on target reads (enrichment) is low and most of reads are from background. This figure for most kits is above 70%. At least one step in target capture has been non-optimal.

    I wonder what is the duplication rate.
    Last edited by nucacidhunter; 12-17-2018, 11:43 PM.

    Comment

    • mhmtgenc
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2016
      • 7

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      It indicates that on target reads (enrichment) is low and most of reads are from background. This figure for most kits is above 70%. At least one step in target capture has been non-optimal.
      Thanks for the answer. So could you suggest anything with that? Because I have been following the exact steps of the kits checklist guide.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Possible important issues:

        1- degraded or low concentration of blocking oligos
        2- inefficient hybridisation step (temperature, time, reaction composition)
        2- non-stringent wash steps

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...