Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bmreilly
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2019
    • 2

    #1

    HiSeq X run: i5 index is reverse complement of i7??

    Hello, I'm puzzled over an issue we are having with an Illumina HiSeq x run we completed recently for a number of reasons.

    We were following the protocol for bisulfite padlock probe sequencing which we have completed successfully recently on a novaSeq 6000 without issue.

    This time, unbenknownst to us, the company sequenced our libraries on a HiSeq X, which has different chemistry, and we had serious issues with the index reads.

    the i7 read seems to have read correctly, but the i5 reads are all very strange, and very few reads actually demultiplexed to the i5 indexes that we used. When troubleshooting we found that many of the i5 indexes with the highest reads assigned were actually the exact reverse complement of the i7 index for those reads. Many other i5 index reads appear to be random sequences not used in indexes.

    Has anyone ever heard of an issue like this? I'm at my wits end here.
  • jdk787
    josh kinman
    • Apr 2014
    • 72

    #2
    The I5 index chemistry for the HiSeqX is different from the NovaSeq. For standard TruSeq style adapters the I5 sequence on the HiSeqX will be the reverse complement of what it is for the NovaSeq.

    If your I5 sequences aren't showing up as the reverse complement, my guess is that your adapters/primers don't have an I5 primer binding site that is compatible with the HiSeqX.

    Josh Kinman

    Comment

    • bmreilly
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2019
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
      The I5 index chemistry for the HiSeqX is different from the NovaSeq. For standard TruSeq style adapters the I5 sequence on the HiSeqX will be the reverse complement of what it is for the NovaSeq.

      If your I5 sequences aren't showing up as the reverse complement, my guess is that your adapters/primers don't have an I5 primer binding site that is compatible with the HiSeqX.

      https://support.illumina.com/content...5057455-04.pdf
      What do you mean by "your adapters/primers don't have an I5 primer binding site that is compatible with the HiSeqX" ? is it possible for these same libraries and primers to work on the NovaSeq but be completely incompatible on the HiSeqX?

      I know that you need an i5 primer for the HiSeq X which wouldn't be necessary on the novaseq because the nova has the grafted p5 oligo, but its unclear to me whether if you used the standard HP11 or whatever i5 index primer why it wouldn't work on the HiSeq X?

      Comment

      • jdk787
        josh kinman
        • Apr 2014
        • 72

        #4
        Originally posted by bmreilly View Post
        What do you mean by "your adapters/primers don't have an I5 primer binding site that is compatible with the HiSeqX" ? is it possible for these same libraries and primers to work on the NovaSeq but be completely incompatible on the HiSeqX?
        Yes, I have actually designed custom dual index primers that work on our MiSeq (NovaSeq style) but not on our MiniSeq (HiSeqX style).

        I know that you need an i5 primer for the HiSeq X which wouldn't be necessary on the novaseq because the nova has the grafted p5 oligo, but its unclear to me whether if you used the standard HP11 or whatever i5 index primer why it wouldn't work on the HiSeq X?
        I would first look at your I5 oligo sequence and compare it to Illumina's.


        TruSeq
        AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC[i5]ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT

        Nextera
        AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC[i5]TCGTCGGCAGCGTC

        If it matches one of these then you should be fine, but if not your oligo may not be compatible with platforms that use the same index chemistry as the HiSeqX.
        Josh Kinman

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...