Title says it all.
This seems like the future for 16S sequencing but haven't heard of anyone validating yet. Seems like 2x250 is enough coverage for 16S and 1 billions plus reads is WAY more cost effective and efficient than Miseq.
Cheers,
Sam
This seems like the future for 16S sequencing but haven't heard of anyone validating yet. Seems like 2x250 is enough coverage for 16S and 1 billions plus reads is WAY more cost effective and efficient than Miseq.
Cheers,
Sam
Comment