in 7 days
In the future me know if you have any programming issues. I'd be glad to help you out.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Thanks, jdilts. Will try things out - as soon as I kill the MIRA assembly (7 days and counting).Originally posted by jdilts View PostThe script isn't too complicated. It would be something similar to this. I hope this can be of some assistance.Code:#/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my $infile ="readFILE"; my $outfile = "quality_readsFILE"; #opens file with reads open (IN,<,$infile) || die $!; my @reads = <IN>; #stores each line in the file into an arrary close (IN); #don't need the file anymore, close it open (OUT,>,$outfile) || die $!; #open the out going file my $j = 0; #array index my $read_name; #iterate through array foreach my $i (@reads){ if ($j%2 = 1) && (length($i)>=75){ print OUT "$read_name\n$i\n";} } else{ $read_name = $i;} #stores read name } close (OUT);
Leave a comment:
-
Not too complicated
The script isn't too complicated. It would be something similar to this. I hope this can be of some assistance.Code:#/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my $infile ="readFILE"; my $outfile = "quality_readsFILE"; #opens file with reads open (IN,<,$infile) || die $!; my @reads = <IN>; #stores each line in the file into an arrary close (IN); #don't need the file anymore, close it open (OUT,>,$outfile) || die $!; #open the out going file my $j = 0; #array index my $read_name; #iterate through array foreach my $i (@reads){ if ($j%2 = 1) && (length($i)>=75){ print OUT "$read_name\n$i\n";} } else{ $read_name = $i;} #stores read name } close (OUT);
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Downsampling
@jdilts - OK, I understand - I need to go see a perl or python programmer. The max read length was 398 but average was 177. My collaborator who did the sequencing did not specify the type of kit used but they're all shotgun reads. I will have to play around with min and max reads.Originally posted by jdilts View PostWhat size do you want the reads? You could cut out all the smaller reads. (Maybe 50bp or less?) To do this you would need to write up a script of some sort. Either perl or python to get the length of each read and then output the reads that "qualify" into an outfile.
Leave a comment:
-
What size do you want the reads? You could cut out all the smaller reads. (Maybe 50bp or less?) To do this you would need to write up a script of some sort. Either perl or python to get the length of each read and then output the reads that "qualify" into an outfile.
Leave a comment:
-
Downsampling ion data
Hi All,
Thanks for your comments - you can all probably see that I'm more comfortable in the Sanger era.
Unfortunately in my Faculty, I'm the "bioinformatics team".
My default SOP is to use all the data - the more the merrier - but I can see now that I've got way too much data than required. How do I downsample 480 Mbp of essentially random reads down to 100-150 Mbp?
All advice is greatly appreciated.
Leave a comment:
-
I concur with IT's comments about excessive coverage. You really need to scale back your input to ~30X. Also why Newbler 2.3? That is a very old version. Get version 2.6, they have made several improvements in the assembler.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi hengnck,Originally posted by hengnck View PostHi - I'm working with a small bacterial genome ~2.0 Mbp but de novo (new species). Got data from an Ion 318 chip, about 480 Mbp. Ran it through Newbler 2.3 - 3,000+ contigs. Set up default MIRA assembly *six* days ago and it's still going. :-( I wouldn't use DNA* - ridiculously expensive for what it does. Roche RefMapper is OK for some of our other known bacterial genomes.
Are you using all 480 Mbp of data in the assembly or are you downsampling? I ask because many software packages (like those you mention) will grossly underperform with excessive coverage, and are reported to work best in the 30X to 50X range (and if this is DNA from pure culture you're at ~240X). Are you a Torrent Suite user and if so are you using the MIRA plugin? The newest (v2.2) version allows you to specify the amount of coverage to use (best results are typically see at ~50X):
Some have commented that they use Newbler at around 30X coverage for de novo assembly.
Leave a comment:
-
I just noticed that CLC bio are offering a free 6 month trial of their CLC genomics workbench to users with a benchtop NGS (i.e. 454 GS Jr, MiSeq or IonTorrent PGM). Anybody have any experience with the CLC software?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi - I'm working with a small bacterial genome ~2.0 Mbp but de novo (new species). Got data from an Ion 318 chip, about 480 Mbp. Ran it through Newbler 2.3 - 3,000+ contigs. Set up default MIRA assembly *six* days ago and it's still going. :-( I wouldn't use DNA* - ridiculously expensive for what it does. Roche RefMapper is OK for some of our other known bacterial genomes.
Leave a comment:
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Genome Sequencing Reveals Large, Repeat-Rich DNA in Trapdoor Spider Named for Stephen Colbert
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
Leave a comment: