Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lingling huang
    Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 48

    #1

    how to understand the output result of PacBio_BasSummary

    Hello there,
    I run PacBio_BasSummary.py program, but I can't understand the result. I want to calculate Productivity 0 (%), Productivity 1 (%), Productivity 2 (%) in command-line. Could someone help to explain ? I'd appreciate that.

    PHP Code:
    longest read was ZMW 159241 at 106496 bases

    statistics 
    for subreads:

     
    reads subreads       bases    avg     max     ZMW  criterion

    163482  2001836  5251467935   2623   94763  159241  Total
    150292  1983394  5207608109   2625   94763  159241  
    --Sequencing
     21870    22683    14034460    618    3839   11438  
    ----Productivity-0
     47816   479854  2021505261   4212   94763  159241  
    ----Productivity-2
     80606  1480857  3172068388   2142   79783  113375  
    ----Productivity-1
     80599  1480776  3171771916   2141   79783  113375  
    ------HQ Len >= 50
     80599  1480776  3171771916   2141   79783  113375  
    --------HQ Score >= 750
     80598  1480706  3171735760   2142   79783  113375  
    ----------Avg Insert >= 100
     80598  1058605  1464546526   1383   56859   73513  
    ----------HQ Bases
         0        0           0      0       0      
    -1  ------------Consensus Reads 
  • gconcepcion
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 68

    #2
    Originally posted by lingling huang View Post
    Hello there,
    I run PacBio_BasSummary.py program, but I can't understand the result. I want to calculate Productivity 0 (%), Productivity 1 (%), Productivity 2 (%) in command-line. Could someone help to explain ? I'd appreciate that.

    PHP Code:
    longest read was ZMW 159241 at 106496 bases

    statistics 
    for subreads:

     
    reads subreads       bases    avg     max     ZMW  criterion

    163482  2001836  5251467935   2623   94763  159241  Total
    150292  1983394  5207608109   2625   94763  159241  
    --Sequencing
     21870    22683    14034460    618    3839   11438  
    ----Productivity-0
     47816   479854  2021505261   4212   94763  159241  
    ----Productivity-2
     80606  1480857  3172068388   2142   79783  113375  
    ----Productivity-1
     80599  1480776  3171771916   2141   79783  113375  
    ------HQ Len >= 50
     80599  1480776  3171771916   2141   79783  113375  
    --------HQ Score >= 750
     80598  1480706  3171735760   2142   79783  113375  
    ----------Avg Insert >= 100
     80598  1058605  1464546526   1383   56859   73513  
    ----------HQ Bases
         0        0           0      0       0      
    -1  ------------Consensus Reads 
    The numbers are in the first column -

    Productivity-0: 21870 / 150292 total = 14.6%
    Productivity-1: 80606 / 150292 total = 53.6%
    Productivity-2: 47816 / 150292 total = 31.8%

    Comment

    • lingling huang
      Member
      • Mar 2016
      • 48

      #3
      Originally posted by gconcepcion View Post
      The numbers are in the first column -

      Productivity-0: 21870 / 150292 total = 14.6%
      Productivity-1: 80606 / 150292 total = 53.6%
      Productivity-2: 47816 / 150292 total = 31.8%
      I see. Thanks a lot.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      72 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...